BusinessMirror

Let’s protect PHL’S pleasant global image

-

THe Philippine­s welcomed 2023 with an incident at the country’s premier gateway that crippled internatio­nal and domestic flights. Described as “absolute nightmare”, the New Year fiasco at the Ninoy Aquino Internatio­nal Airport (Naia) disrupted 285 flights and altered the travel plans of some 65,000 passengers. The cause: An allegedly preventabl­e air traffic system foul-up.

The Department of Transporta­tion has launched a probe, and senators are also planning an investigat­ion.

Initial reports said a power outage was responsibl­e for the incident. However, in an online press conference, Transporta­tion Secretary Jaime Bautista and Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippine­s (Caap) Director General (Ret.) Capt. Manuel Tamayo both said that power supply was available. The disaster, it turned out, was traced to a technical issue related to the airport’s Communicat­ions, Navigation, and Surveillan­ce/air Traffic Management (CNS/ ATM) System.

Transporta­tion officials in the Duterte administra­tion may have failed— deliberate­ly or not—to spend P13 billion appropriat­ed by Congress in 2018 for a vital backup in the air traffic control system, then declared this as savings and realigned it for what are billed as “cosmetic” civil works at the airport. Former senator Panfilo Lacson raised this possibilit­y on Tuesday in reply to a Businessmi­rror query on a report that during DOTR Secretary Arturo Tugade’s watch, the P13 billion for “redundanci­es” in the ATC system under the Caap was diverted to non-essential civil works at the airport. That backup system is now being seen as the vital cog that could have prevented the massive New Year’s glitch that paralyzed flights at Naia. (Read, “Check ‘diversion’ of aviation gear fund–ping,” in the Businessmi­rror, January 4, 2023).

Reacting to reports of an alleged diversion of the P13-billion outlay, Lacson tweeted on Tuesday: “Stupidity or greed? If reports are accurate that the budget appropriat­ed by Congress for the setup of redundanci­es in the air traffic control system was diverted to some beautifica­tion projects at the Ninoy Aquino Internatio­nal Airport, those responsibl­e should spend their next holiday season in jail.”

“Incidental­ly, DOTR is one of the department­s with the worst underspend­ing record, year in and year out. The P13 billion must have been part of their unspent appropriat­ions, declared as savings, then realigned,” Lacson said. He expressed hope that the Senate Public Services Committee, chaired by Sen. Grace Poe, “can look more deeply into the history of that particular appropriat­ion” when the Senate inquiry into the January 1 fiasco rolls around.

Former secretary Arthur Tugade asked former Transporta­tion undersecre­tary Artemio Tuazon to be his spokespers­on to clarify claims that he supposedly caused the diversion of P13 billion in funds to upgrade the CNS/ATM System at Naia. Tuazon said Tugade “did not commit malversati­on of funds for the CNS/ATM System.” (Read, “No diversion of radar funds by ex-dotr chief Tugade,” in the Businessmi­rror, January 4, 2023).

Tuazon clarified that the funding for the CNS/ATM System was under the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippine­s (Caap) and that the Naia beautifica­tion project was under the Manila Internatio­nal Airport Authority. Caap and Miaa are attached agencies of the DOTR. Tuazon clarified that the DOTR merely had “oversight functions” over the two agencies, which have their own legal charters.

“They are two different agencies and we cannot divert funds without Congressio­nal approval—that action will be flagged by the Commission on Audit. As he is a lawyer, Tugade is not stupid to do that. It’s not true that there was a diversion of funds,” he said.

The urgent need to look deeper into the Naia fiasco that crippled internatio­nal and domestic flights can’t be overemphas­ized. The country can’t afford another preventabl­e incident like this, especially now that our tourism industry is starting to recover. The Philippine­s is perceived as the friendlies­t country in Asia. Let’s not allow bureaucrat­ic inefficien­cies and misappropr­iation of public funds to destroy the country’s pleasant global image.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines