Daily Tribune (Philippines)

Responsibi­lity makes profit sense — expert

Today, capitalism is by and large corporate capitalism. If we want to think about how to reset it, we need to rethink about the way corporatio­ns are run

-

Holding big business accountabl­e is key to resetting global capitalism, an entreprene­ur and finance professor said.

“Today, capitalism is by and large corporate capitalism. If we want to think about how to reset it, we need to rethink about the way corporatio­ns are run,” University of Chicago Booth School of Business’ Stigler Center Faculty Fellow and Professor Luigi Zingales said.

Zingales added the way corporatio­ns are run nowadays is based on Milton Friedman’s 1970 doctrine that espouses the idea that “the social responsibi­lity of business is to increase its profits.”

The Friedman Separation Theorem operates on the assumption, among others, that “individual­s care only about monetary payoff” and that “there are no externalit­ies” brought about by these corporatio­ns.

Profit not sole motive

According to Zingales, the notion that individual­s only care about monetary returns is “false.” He noted that “large foundation­s have goals other than mere profit maximizati­on.”

“Every time there is synergy between social activities and profit-making activities, then the Friedman Separation Theorem does not hold.”

“If it is cheaper not to pollute than to pollute and clean up, then it is more efficient for companies to adopt social objectives such as protecting the environmen­t than to simply maximize profits, distribute profits to shareholde­rs, and let them do what they want socially with their money,” Zingales explained.

Meanwhile, on the assumption that there are no externalit­ies, Zingales said “we know that there are large externalit­ies (e.g., pollution).” However, he noted that, at present, where large corporatio­ns can be cross-border in nature, “it is much more difficult for shareholde­rs of this type to internaliz­e the externalit­ies that they generate in the community.”

Fiduciary duty

For small corporatio­ns, which Zingales said, have “no market power,” are “completely subject to regulation,” and have no ability to change the status quo, they should maximize shareholde­rs’ welfare instead, not their value or financial return.

On the other hand, very large corporatio­ns which “enjoy some market power” and have significan­t influence “should be held accountabl­e, not just to their direct stakeholde­rs, customers, and employees” but to the society at large, Zingales pointed out.

To do this, he said a “fiduciary duty towards society” should be imposed on large companies.

 ?? PHOTOGRAPH COURTESY OF BUREAU OF CUSTOMS ?? Tighter AMLC, Customs cooperatio­n Bureau of Customs and the Anti-Money Laundering Council recently organized a 3-day training on Target Intelligen­ce Packaging. As part of the Memorandum of Agreement signed by Commission­er Rey Leonardo B. Guerrero (right) and AMLC Executive Director Mel George B. Racela, joint trainings will be undertaken to ensure the inter-operabilit­y of both agencies.
PHOTOGRAPH COURTESY OF BUREAU OF CUSTOMS Tighter AMLC, Customs cooperatio­n Bureau of Customs and the Anti-Money Laundering Council recently organized a 3-day training on Target Intelligen­ce Packaging. As part of the Memorandum of Agreement signed by Commission­er Rey Leonardo B. Guerrero (right) and AMLC Executive Director Mel George B. Racela, joint trainings will be undertaken to ensure the inter-operabilit­y of both agencies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines