Daily Tribune (Philippines)

‘System overhaul’ of military

- PLAIN VIEW PRIMER PAGUNURAN

“In whatever manner the appointmen­ts may have been made or whatever petty row or imbroglio they created in the defense or military hierarchie­s, the fact is the President eventually approved them.

The term “class interest”, in light of our state of affairs, may likewise apply in the defense and military establishm­ents — ruled up to now — by what Dr. Carolina Hernandez calls the “military elites.” As products of the Philippine Military Academy or

foreign academies, their esprit de corps influences their rise in the hierarchy.

However, class interest is never a good gauge of profession­alism or excellence in the armed or uniformed service since this monolithic organizati­on also tends to self-destruct. When leadership is determined in terms of the graduating class the candidate appointee belongs to, the more important criteria to guide selection is swept aside and whosoever is chosen sometimes proves to be a disservice.

The recent reshufflin­g in the defense and military establishm­ents could be cause for concern since appointmen­ts to key positions gravitate around three central givens, namely: 1) line of succession; 2) “mistah” culture; 3) relevant laws. The third factor largely dictates appointmen­ts as AFP Chief of Staff and as DND Secretary while the second factor indicates who become the “ruling class” in either the AFP or DND.

Notably, two specific laws “interfere” with appointmen­ts to key positions, even affecting career growth and undemocrat­izing opportunit­ies in a supposedly level playing field. For one, Section 18 of Republic Act No. 11709 has rendered Lt. Gen. Jose Faustino, Jr. ineligible when it bans the appointmen­t of a retired military officer as Secretary of National Defense within one year from the date of his retirement.

For another, Section 4 of Republic Act No. 8186 imposes a prohibitio­n in that “no officer shall be assigned or designated to certain key positions including as Commanding General of the Philippine Army if he has less than one year of active service remaining prior to compulsory retirement at the age of 56.” As though by destiny, the same Lt. Gen. Jose Faustino, Jr. was removed as then acting Commanding General of the Philippine Army in favor of General Andres Centino.

The 9th of January 2023 could be marked as a milestone in defense and military history. It was when the President appointed General Andres Centino as CSAFP and General Carlito Galvez, Jr. as SND ultimately displacing Lt. Gen. Bartolome Bacarro and Lt. Gen. Jose Faustino, Jr., respective­ly.

No counterfac­tual narrative can contradict the fact that there had been a kind of “embargo” in the entire appointmen­t process where it concerned the case of Lt. Gen. Faustino as well as Lt. Gen. Bacarro who were earlier appointed by FM Jr. himself as OIC-DND and CSAFP, respective­ly. However quickly downplayed, it triggered a row between and among military elites — one class against another — in a mute tug of war.

A crucial provision in Sec. 4 of RA 8186 begs mention, viz: “Provided, That except for the Chief of Staff of the AFP, no officer shall be designated to the key positions (as cited) or promoted to the rank of Brigadier General/Commodore or higher if he has less than one year of active service remaining prior to compulsory retirement.” Verily, luck is not on the side of Lt. Gen. Bacarro.

In whatever manner the appointmen­ts may have been made or whatever petty row or imbroglio they created in the defense or military hierarchie­s, the fact is the President eventually approved them. Such choice, by presidenti­al fiat, has legs to stand on.

Whether or not the selection pathway was followed (i.e. nominees of AFP

Board of Generals to SND to the President); the

CSAFP turnover ceremony was held at short notice, even indoors; the National Security

Adviser was left uninformed or confused, the crux of this whole affair is that this imbroglio is below the threshold to cause demoraliza­tion or restivenes­s in the entire officer corps.

If RA 11709 and RA 8186 have jeopardize­d career futures in the cases mentioned, what makes the new S ND, Gen. Galve z—retired since 2018, a Duterte hold-over, 60-years old — unique? Humor us or walk us through.

“Notably, two specific laws “interfere” with appointmen­ts to key positions, even affecting career growth and undemocrat­izing opportunit­ies in a supposedly level playing field.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines