Daily Tribune (Philippines)

Sanofi plea for Dengvaxia denied

The FDA was asked by Sanofi to reconsider the revocation, claiming it was denied due process for lack of notice

-

The petition filed by Sanofi Pasteur Inc. challengin­g the government decision revoking its certificat­es of product registrati­on for Dengvaxia vaccine was denied by the Court of Appeals.

In a decision written by Associate Justice Eduardo S. Ramos Jr., the CA said: “All told, it is our view that the expiration of the marketing authorizat­ion on 22 Dec. 2020, has rendered this case moot and academic. It is thus futile to insist on the reinstatem­ent of the CPRs whose validity period had long expired.”

On 29 December 2017, the Food and Drug Administra­tion suspended Sanofi’s CPRs for one year with a fine of P100,000 for failure to submit post-approval commitment documents. On 21 December 2018, FDA revoked Sanofi’s CPRs.

The FDA was asked by Sanofi to reconsider the revocation, claiming it was denied due process for lack of notice.

Also, Sanofi said that it had complied with the post-marketing authorizat­ion requiremen­ts.

When its motion for reconsider­ation was denied by the FDA, it filed an appeal before the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health which likewise denied the appeal on 19 August 2019.

An appeal was filed by Sanofi to the Office of the President which also denied its plea.

It opted to file a petition before the CA, telling the court that even if it complies with its post-marketing authorizat­ion requiremen­ts, there is no basis for the immediate revocation of the CPRs.

The CA, agreeing with the Office of the Solicitor General which represente­d the FDA and the DoH — ruled that the reinstatem­ent of the pharmaceut­ical firm’s CPRs would no longer be possible as it had already expired on 22 December 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines