Daily Tribune (Philippines)

Service incentive pay

- ATTY. JOJI ALONSO & ASSOCIATES

Dear Atty. Vlad,

I am an office staff in a restaurant in Malolos City, Bulacan. I was employed there for five years. During my entire stay, I neither used any of my leaves nor was my unused leaves monetized. Last 15 January 2024, I resigned from my work as I found a better paying job in San Fernando, Pampanga. When I went to my employer to ask for my service incentive leave pay, I was only given the equivalent of three years because according to my employer, prescripti­on has already set in. Is my employer correct? Please guide me. Myra

Dear Myra,

Contrary to your employer’s assertion, prescripti­on has not yet set in.

In the case of Lourdes C. Rodriguez vs. Park N Ride, Inc. Nicest (Phils.) Inc.,/Grand Leisure Corp./ Sps. Vicente & Estelita B. Javier, March 20, 2017, G.R. No. 222980 (citing the case of Auto Bus Transport System, Inc. vs. Bautista; 497 Phil. 863, 2005), the Court explained, as follows:

“However, Auto Bus Transport System, Inc. v. Bautista clarified the correct reckoning of the prescripti­ve period for service incentive leave pay: x x x

Applying Article 291 of the Labor Code in light of this peculiarit­y of the service incentive leave, we can conclude that the three-year prescripti­ve period commences, not at the end of the year when the employee becomes entitled to the commutatio­n of his service incentive leave, but from the time when the employer refuses to pay its monetary equivalent after demand of commutatio­n or upon terminatio­n of the employee’s services, as the case may be.

The above construal of Art. 291, vis-a-vis the rules on service incentive leave, is in keeping with the rudimentar­y principle that in the implementa­tion and interpreta­tion of the provisions of the Labor Code and its implementi­ng regulation­s, the workingman’s welfare should be the primordial and paramount considerat­ion. The policy is to extend the applicabil­ity of the decree to a greater number of employees who can avail of the benefits under the law, which is in consonance with the avowed policy of the State to give maximum aid and protection to labor. (Emphasis supplied).

From the above-cited Decision of the Court, your employer is wrong in stating that prescripti­on has already set in. The three-year prescripti­ve period sets in only from the time of demand. Since you made the demand immediatel­y after your resignatio­n, your right to receive your service incentive leave was within the three-year prescripti­ve period. In addition, since you were already paid the equivalent of three years of service incentive leave pay you are still entitled to an additional Service Incentive Leave Pay equivalent to two years or 10 days of Service Incentive Leave Pay.

I hope that I was able to guide you based on what you shared with me. Atty. Vlad del Rosario

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines