Daily Tribune (Philippines)

SC denies plea to halt POGO rules, regulation­s

- BY ALVIN MURCIA @tribunephl_alvi

In a stunning decision, the Supreme Court rejected a petition to halt the enforcemen­t of rules and regulation­s for Philippine Offshore Gaming Operations approved by the Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporatio­n Board in 2016.

In a recent 15-page decision penned by Associate Justice Jhosep Lopez, the High Court en banc held that the Temporary Restrainin­g Order petition of the Union for National Developmen­t and Good Governance Philippine­s, Anti-Trapo Movement of the Philippine­s Inc., and lawyer Jovencio Evangelist­a — failed to observe the doctrine of hierarchy of courts and establish the transcende­ntal importance of the issues raised in the case to warrant a judicial review.

The SC noted that the petitioner­s had no legal standing to file the petition since they had not shown any direct and personal interest in enforcing the RR-POGO.

The RR-POGO outlines the procedure for licensing, accreditat­ion, and registrati­on of offshore gaming operators, agents, and other auxiliary service providers.

They also failed, the court added, to show that they had sustained or were in danger of sustaining direct injury due to its implementa­tion.

It said the parties with a more direct and personal interest in the issue were the offshore gaming operators and other auxiliarie­s. However, none of them joined in the petitions.

“Verily, the supposed transcende­ntal importance of the questions raised in the case was not sufficient­ly establishe­d,” the SC decision read.

“With regard to their prayer for the issuance of a temporary restrainin­g order and/or writ of preliminar­y injunction, petitioner­s failed to show that there was an invasion of a clear material and substantia­l right, or an urgent and paramount necessity to prevent serious damage. Consequent­ly, their prayer for the issuance of a temporary restrainin­g order and/ or writ of preliminar­y injunction is denied,” it added.

In the three consolidat­ed petitions, the groups argued that the RR-POGO was unconstitu­tional because PAGCPR has no authority to operate and regulate online or offshore gaming operations.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines