Daily Tribune (Philippines)

Evolution pains

- Dean Nilo Divina C(87$50."+&($

The recent electricit­y outages in which 39 power plants throughout the country bogged down, causing an unpreceden­ted scare, are expected to persist until the power sector firms up its foothold in the renewable energy shift that may include the transition to nuclear energy.

Power firms are being weaned away from fossil fuel projects due to the country’s internatio­nal commitment­s under the Paris Agreement of 2015, a binding pact among 196 countries, including the Philippine­s, to take actions that will reduce carbon emissions that alter the global weather patterns.

While valid issues are being raised about the phase-out of coal plants since they remain necessary for a developing nation such as the Philippine­s, the march towards a fossil fuel-free source of electricit­y cannot be reversed.

A compelling reason is that banks restrict their exposure to lending for convention­al fossil fuel projects.

The DoE has also adopted a policy not to approve new coal plant projects while pushing for the early retirement of coal-fired power plants to support the complete transition to renewable energy. Still, it admitted that such a move entails transition costs, including a slower buildup of generation capacity.

The country has already taken its first steps in the right direction by imposing a coal moratorium in 2020. From 10.3 gigawatts (GW) of proposed pre-constructi­on coal capacity in 2019, this decreased to 4.094 GW in 2023.

Recent developmen­ts point to an increasing­ly narrowing space for coal developmen­t in the country. Even outside the Philippine­s, more and more financial institutio­ns are turning their backs on coal, according to the Center for Energy, Ecology and Developmen­t (CEED).

The CEED counted over 200 global institutio­ns, including banks, multilater­al developmen­t financiers, insurance companies, and asset managers, that have implemente­d policies that ban funding thermal coal mining and/or coal-fired power projects.

Financiers have recognized that coal projects are not “great long-term investment­s” due to accelerati­ng climate action, improved viability of renewable energy, and increasing understand­ing of the systemic risks global warming poses to the financial system.

The Department of Energy (DoE) data showed that power-generating capacity only inched up by 0.12 percent last year compared to the 5.6 percent gross domestic product growth.

Renewable energy (RE), however, proves to be more costly and less reliable than convention­al power sources. While technologi­es are developing to make RE a primary energy source, natural gas has been identified as a transition fuel.

This pivot was reflected in the conversion of the Atimonan One (A1E) project from a coal plant to a liquefied natural gas facility after numerous failures to secure the necessary permits.

Banks’ inclinatio­n towards gas financing is among the reasons for the shift to gas.

Since the 2015 Paris Agreement, financial institutio­ns have poured $60.3 billion into Southeast Asia’s gas industry.

Four Japanese banks have contribute­d a combined total of $9.7 billion, making them among Southeast Asia’s top 10 largest financiers of gas projects. Thailand banks have also emerged as major financiers of projects, providing $10.2 billion in loans.

According to the CEED, the Philippine­s received a total of $4.7 billion in gas financing, with internatio­nal institutio­ns accounting for $3.2 billion and domestic institutio­ns financing $1.5 billion.

Gas projects in the Philippine­s received financial backing from about 41 internatio­nal financial institutio­ns, led by Japan, the United States, Australia, Taiwan and the Netherland­s, CEED reported.

The largest gas financing came from Japanese financial institutio­ns such as the Developmen­t Bank of Japan, Japan Bank for Internatio­nal Cooperatio­n, Mizuho Bank and Securities, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporatio­n, which totaled $944 million.

While the shift creates a tectonic effect on the supply and cost of electricit­y, the government is responsibl­e for preventing electricit­y users from suffering its consequenc­es.

The power generating and distributi­on utilities have the enviable privilege of passing all the costs they incur to the monthly electricit­y bills.

The government’s job, in turn, is to find ways to ensure that electricit­y is generated at the least cost, as required under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act.

“The power generating and distributi­on utilities have the enviable privilege of passing all the costs they incur to the monthly electricit­y bills.

“While valid issues are being raised about the phase-out of coal plants since they remain necessary for a developing nation such as the Philippine­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines