Daily Tribune (Philippines)

Liability for cyber libel in socmed comments

- ATTY. JOJI ALONSO & ASSOCIATES Atty. Mary Antonnette M. Baudi

Dear Atty. Maan,

My sister was maligned through a Facebook post that contained false, malicious imputation­s. She is contemplat­ing filing a cyber libel case against the post’s author. Since the post has already garnered a significan­t number of shares, likes, and comments, I was wondering if liking, sharing, or commenting on an openly defamatory post can be considered grounds for cyber libel?

Lauren

Dear Lauren,

The Supreme Court, in the case of Disini, et al. vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. 203335, 11 February 2014, held that liking, sharing, or retweeting a libelous post would generally not be criminal in nature and subject the person liking, sharing or retweeting to liability for the crime of cyber libel:

“Except for the original author of the assailed statement, the rest (those who pressed Like, Comment and Share) are essentiall­y knee-jerk sentiments of readers who may think little or haphazardl­y of their response to the original posting. Will they be liable for aiding or abetting? And, considerin­g the inherent impossibil­ity of joining hundreds or thousands of responding “Friends” or “Followers” in the criminal charge to be filed in court, who will make a choice as to who should go to jail for the outbreak of the challenged posting?”

The Supreme Court clarified that individual­s who engage with online content, such as liking, sharing, retweeting, or commenting, simply react to or express agreement with the original author’s statements. They should not be regarded as the content creators they interact with. The author, or originator, always remains the person who initiated the content.

Moreover, individual­s who merely share or retweet defamatory content are similarly not legally liable for cyber libel for the same fundamenta­l reason: they are not the authors of the content. In all these scenarios, there are two additional reasons why they are not liable for cyber libel. First, they lack the same criminal intent as the original defamatory author, and second, no specific law punishes the act of sharing, liking, commenting, or retweeting content that is openly defamatory.

“The old parameters for enforcing the traditiona­l form of libel would be a square peg in a round hole when applied to cyberspace libel. Unless the legislatur­e crafts a cyber libel law that takes into account its unique circumstan­ces and culture, such a law will tend to create a chilling effect on the millions that use this new medium of communicat­ion in violation of their constituti­onally guaranteed right to freedom of expression.” I hope this helps.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines