Manila Bulletin

Ombudsman orders dismissal of Jinggoy staff, 13 others

- By JUN RAMIREZ

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales has ordered the dismissal from the service of former Senator Jinggoy Estrada’s deputy chief of staff and 13 other government officials implicated in the alleged anomalous disburseme­nt of the ex-lawmaker’s 1480.5-million Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund (PDAF).

Apart from dismissal, the 14 government officials were also permanentl­y banned from holding public office in the future after they were found administra­tively guilty of grave misconduct, dishonesty, and conduct prejudicia­l to the best interest of the service.

Ordered dismissed were Estrada’s deputy chief of staff Therese Mary Labayen; Antonio Ortiz, Dennis Cunanan and Marivic Jover of the Technology Resource Center (TRC); Gondelina Amata, Evelyn Sucgang, Chita Jalndoni, Emmanuel Alexis Sevidal and Sofia Cruz of the National Livelihood Developmen­t Corporatio­n (NLDC); Victor Roman Cacal, Maria Ninez Guanizo, Romulo Relevo, Julie Villaralvo-Johnson, and Rhodora Mendoza of the National Agribusine­ss Corporatio­n (Nabcor).

But in the event of separation from the service, the penalty is convertibl­e to a fine equivalent to respondent’s salary for one year.

Labayen and the 13 other respondent­s are also being tried before the Sandiganba­yan for their alleged involvemen­t in the alleged misuse of Estrada’s PDAF from 2007 to 2009.

Investigat­ion found out that for the three-year period, a total of 1480.6 million was taken from Senator Estrada’s PDAF, out of which amount 1278 million was coursed through non-government organizati­ons (NGOs) controlled by Janet Lim Napoles, the alleged pork barrel scam mastermind.

The 1278 million was released by the Department of Budget and Management after which, Estrada allegedly through Labayen, identified the Nabcor, NLDC, and TRC as implementi­ng agencies, and coursed through the Napoles NGOs – Masaganang Ani Para sa Magsasaka Foundation, Inc. and Social Developmen­t Program for Farmers Foundation, Inc.

The 1278-million fund was intended to buy livelihood materials like farm implements, livelihood kits in dressmakin­g, nail care, pickled fruits, and veggies, jewelry-making, soap-making, silkscreen printing, aromatic candle making, wellness massage, cell phone repair, basic auto repair, and food processing.

Estrada allegedly identified the following provinces as project-beneficiar­ies: Misamis Occidental, Zamboanga Sibugay, Tawi-Tawi, Cotabato, Batangas, Quezon, Pangasinan, Bulacan, Agusan del Sur, Agusan del Norte, Laguna, Tuguegarao, and Compostela Valley.

Actual field validation conducted by the Ombudsman revealed that no deliveries were made to the supposed beneficiar­ies.

Mayors and municipal agricultur­ists denied receiving any of the items from the office Senator Estrada, the implementi­ng agencies, or any of the NGOs.

The documents submitted by the NGOs such as disburseme­nt, progress, accomplish­ment reports, fund utilizatio­n reports, delivery and inspection reports were allegedly all fabricated.

During the investigat­ion, whistleblo­wer Benhur Luy submitted records to show that “Estrada received, through Labayen and Ruby Tuason, total commission­s, or kickbacks amounting to at least 1183.7 million.”

As defense, some of the respondent­s argued that “the filing of the complaints was premature because the Commission on Audit (COA) had yet to issue notices of disallowan­ces on disburseme­nts drawn from the PDAF.

But Ombudsman Morales ruled that “administra­tive proceeding­s pertaining to a COA disallowan­ce is distinct and separate from a preliminar­y investigat­ion in a criminal case which have arisen from the same set of facts. Both proceeding­s may proceed independen­tly of each other.”

The COA observed that the NGOs that received the multi-million peso PDAF releases did not have the track record to implement the projects and the selection of the NGOs, as well as the alleged procuremen­t of goods for distributi­on of beneficiar­ies did not undergo public bidding.

COA also noted that the suppliers denied having dealt with any of the NGOs and the reported beneficiar­ies were unknown or could not be located at their given addresses.

“The concerned officials of Nabcor, NLDC, and TRC did not even bother to conduct a due diligence audit on the selected NGOs and the supplier by the NGO to provide the livelihood kits, which supply was carried out without the benefit of public bidding, in contravent­ion of existing procuremen­t rules and regulation­s,” added Morales.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines