Manila Bulletin

Trump’s UN speech shows nationalis­t instincts firmly intact

-

By and

NEW YORK, United States Reuters) — Chalk one up for the nationalis­ts. Among the many signals that Donald Trump sent in his speech to the United Nations on Tuesday, one was especially clear: former chief strategist Steve Bannon’s White House departure has not muted the president’s “America First” foreign policy instincts.

Trump’s eight months in office have been characteri­zed by a sometimes dramatic tug-of-war between “globalists” and “nationalis­t” advisers who have sought to move the president in myriad ways on issues both domestic and internatio­nal.

Bannon’s exit last month caused some of the former New York businessma­n’s core supporters to fret that the more multilater­al-leaning group inside the administra­tion had gained ground.

Not on foreign policy, at least not on Tuesday.

Trump’s strident defense of national sovereignt­y during his debut at the annual U.N. General Assembly showed his campaign-honed policy inclinatio­ns very much intact and presented a Trump Doctrine to the world that focused unabashedl­y on the U.S. homeland.

“The chief nationalis­t in this administra­tion is Donald J. Trump. And he knows what he’s trying to say,” said Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the U.S. House of Representa­tives and a Trump supporter.

He said the speech showed that Trump had a doctrine that was defined by more than tweets, with roots in the conservati­ve philosophi­es of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan, France’s Charles de Gaulle, and Britain’s Margaret Thatcher.

“It’s not a one-sided American nationalis­m, it’s a re-centering on sovereignt­y that’s really, really important,” Gingrich said.

The speech, in which Trump threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea if attacked, divided Trump’s supporters and opponents. Ben Rhodes, an adviser to former Democratic President Barack Obama, said Trump was upending internatio­nal order with threats of war and attacks on diplomacy.

It did not divide Trump’s often warring advisers, however, an administra­tion official said.

“It was the most collaborat­ive speech among the senior people in the national security cabinet that the president has given to date,” the official said.

He said Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stood up after Trump’s speech and shook chief speechwrit­er Stephen Miller’s hand and said “you did a great job.” Miller is considered a nationalis­t and an ally of Bannon, while Tillerson is more globally minded.

“This was more ... Trump just being Trump,” said Sam Nunberg, a former Trump campaign adviser, adding he thought the nationalis­t versus globalist tension in the administra­tion played itself out more on domestic policy issues such as immigratio­n policy.

The administra­tion has given mixed signals on foreign policy, too. Gary Cohn, the president’s top economic adviser and a member of the so-called globalist wing, had to clarify with U.S. allies this week that Trump still intended to pull the United States out of the Paris climate change agreement unless there were a renegotiat­ion to make it more favorable for U.S. interests.

But Trump seemed to stun some people in the United Nations hall, despite his well-known penchant for blunt talk. His speech included a condemnati­on of the Iran nuclear agreement reached with U.S. allies under Obama, and an observatio­n that some portions of the world were “going to hell”.

Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for Democratic and Republican administra­tions, said allies would interpret the speech as a sign that Trump was wary of undertakin­g major commitment­s around the world.

“Neither of the biggest problems, North Korea and Iran, can be solved by an America First, Lone Ranger policy,” he said, adding the speech showed that globalists within his administra­tions were “throwaways” and that Trump was still driven by nationalis­m.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines