Manila Bulletin

Manila Bay reclamatio­n projects opposed

- By ANALOU DE VERA

A coalition of environmen­t advocates staged a picket rally in Malate, Manila on Thursday to oppose the “Horizon Manila” reclamatio­n project and other similar ventures in the historic Manila Bay, citing “environmen­tal hazards that it will cause to the city (of Manila) and the entire National Capital Region.”

A Memorandum of Understand­ing (MOU) with the Philippine Reclamatio­n Authority (PRA) Chairman of the Board Alberto Agra, General Manager JaniloRu-biato and J-Bros president Engr. Jesusito Legaspi Jr., was signed last June 1 for the constructi­on of the 419-hectare Horizon Manila project worth 1100 billion. Mayor Estrada led the MOU signing.

Under the project, three artificial islands will be constructe­d in the Manila Bay, between the Manila-Pasay City border in the south and Roxas Boulevard in the east, stretching to about 3.5 kilometers off the shores of the bay.

Apart from Horizon Manila, the administra­tion of Manila Mayor Joseph Estrada has already approved three other reclamatio­n projects touted to bring economic benefits to both the city and its residents.

More flooding feared

But environmen­t group “Mamamayan Para sa Kalikasan Coalition” believes otherwise, stating that the “creation of three islands that is connected by artificial bridges will exacerbate flooding in Manila.” The reclamatio­n land, according to them, will “block rain water from escaping to the sea thereby trapping it within the city because the reclamatio­n island will be higher than the water, it will form a bowl that will keep flood waters in.”

But the city government insisted that through this milestone project, it is closer to achieving its goal in regaining “The Pearl of the Orient” tag.

The group said that the area of Manila Bay along the historic districts of Ermita, Malate, and Intramuros “has been important culture, art, and tourism destinatio­ns whose potential should be maximized along what the other great cities have done for the waterfront and historical districts and improved rather than destroyed.”

The environmen­tal group also cited Resolution No. 19, series of 2012, of the National Historic Commission of the Philippine­s, declaring Manila Bay and Waterfront, from Delpan Bridge to the Cultural Center of the Philippine­s on Roxas Boulevard, as a national historical landmark.

The group said it is necessary “to understand how this reclamatio­n plans will impact human communitie­s, marine geology, biodiversi­ty, heritage structure, and climate change.”

“No doubt, the said project will directly affect the entire community made up of residents, businesses, tourism establishm­ents, cultural heritage center, and the Filipino people, and will destroy all hopes of making Manila the center of culture, arts, and recreation and tourism,” the group said.

But the city government boosted that the project will generate thousands of jobs and livelihood opportunit­ies for the people of Manila, and will also boost funding for social programs in the various fields such as education, healthcare, infrastruc­ture, among others.

 ?? (Ali Vicoy) ?? NO TO RECLAMATIO­N – Protesters picket outside the DENR office in San Andres, Manila, Thursday to condemn the Manila Bay reclamatio­n project.
(Ali Vicoy) NO TO RECLAMATIO­N – Protesters picket outside the DENR office in San Andres, Manila, Thursday to condemn the Manila Bay reclamatio­n project.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines