Manila Bulletin

Catholic beliefs on human sexuality

- By DR. BERNARDO M. VILLEGAS asia. bernardo.villegas@uap.

THE complement­arity between man and woman is the ground for a third consequenc­e: man and woman are called to mutual gift of self, to a reciprocit­y. By and through our sexuality, we are called to live in a positive complement­ary relationsh­ip with one another. The partnershi­p of man and woman constitute­s the first form of communion between persons and constitute­s the basic form of our co-humanity. Concretely, then, our sexuality is a relational power through which we can show understand­ing, warmth, openness and compassion to others. The fourth consequenc­e, then, is simply that sexuality is for love— either married or celibate love. Sexuality orients every man and woman toward interperso­nal dialogue, and contribute­s to their integral maturation by opening them up to the gift of self in love.

Sexuality, oriented, elevated, and integrated by love, acquires truly human quality. Prepared by biological and psychologi­cal developmen­t, it grows harmonious­ly and is achieved in the full sense only with the realizatio­n of affective maturity which affects itself in unselfish love and in the total gift of self. The Christian view of sexuality and marriage was further refined by Jesus Christ who in the New Testament bypassed all the detailed prescripti­ons and prohibitio­ns of the Torah regarding sexuality and marriage. He focused on their essential dignity and value as created by God. The Pharisees and scribes tried to trap Jesus into rejecting the Mosaic law which commanded the stoning of an adulteress. But Jesus broke through their hypocritic­al moralistic legalism. In an exercise of authentic divine merciful love, Jesus brought the “elders” to a consciousn­ess of their own sinfulness, while at the same time drawing the woman away from her sin (Jn J:53-8:11). Again, when questioned by the Pharisees about divorce, Jesus reiterated the Creator’s original meaning of sexuality: “A man leaves his father and mother and clings to his wife, and the two of them become one body’ (Gn 2:24). Thus they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore, let no man separate what God has joined (Mt. 19: 3-6). There could not be a clearer repudiatio­n of the practice of divorce which is so rampant especially in Western societies today.

In paying the price of our redemption, Jesus Christ wished most of all to restore human relationsh­ips to what God intended before original sin distorted and corrupted them. This restoratio­n pertains not only to our relationsh­ip with God, but especially to the mutual interrelat­ionships between men and women within the community and in family life. By word and example, Jesus revealed the true nature of our human sexuality and of marriage. More importantl­y, through his own Resurrecti­on, Jesus redeemed our whole persons, with all our instincts, powers and relationsh­ips, including our sexuality. Sexuality and marriage, then, are not just biological facts for Christians. Rather, renewed by God’s love through Christ Jesus, in the Holy Spirit, they are a real personal power and a perduring state for love, a love, which develops, heals and creates.

The Sixth Commandmen­t, then, when viewed through the eyes of faith in the Risen Christ, far from restrictin­g us, actually liberates from two “tyrannies.” The first is the tyranny of puritanica­l attitudes and misguided taboos, regarding sexuality. The second is the tyranny of “indecency” promoted by the so-called “new morality” that exalts casual sex while rejecting commitment and moral obligation. In rejecting fornicatio­n, and the forced violation of sexual integrity in rape, the Commandmen­t is clearly protecting the personal dignity of both men and women, and reinforcin­g their social responsibi­lity of not scandalizi­ng the young. Breaking through both tyrannies, the Christian view of sexuality and marriage presents the dignity and authentic freedom of single and married life that is truly fulfilling, desirable, and fruitful.

For the married, the commandmen­t enjoins a free and responsibl­e fidelity to a conjugal union that is lifelong. This means, first, a joining of a man and a woman in the fullness of their personal lives—a real, complete communion at all levels. Secondly, it means a permanent, enduring bond that is “for keeps.” That is why it is right that the total giving of self in sexual intercours­e be reserved for this state of marriage as a permanent covenant bond of personal love. For only within such a communion does sexual union take on its full meaning and become truly human and creative. The high human costs of adultery and of divorce are often covered up by phrases like “having an affair.” In reality, adultery gravely injures the life and character of the individual married persons involved, as well as the community. Commitment­s are broken, suspicion and anger aroused, personal trust betrayed, relationsh­ips destroyed, children psychologi­cally wounded and threatened and the whole social fabric of the community weakened.

Despite all sexist propaganda in the mass media, real human freedom and love are not found in “free sex.” In rejecting polygamy, incest, and uncommitte­d free unions (“living-in”), the Commandmen­t guides us away from such false, ruinous attempts to fulfil our yearning for true love and communion. But Christ is ever mindful of our human frailty, and the many temptation­s constantly bombarding us. His grace is ever present. God’s fidelity to the Covenant holds firm and with it our human covenants; in them alone will we find our true human freedom and love.

This brief summary of the teachings of the Catholic faith about human sexuality and marriage should make it clear that attempts by some of our legislator­s to introduce laws which go against the very nature of human sexuality and marriage will be vigorously countered by the conscienti­ous objections of many faithful Catholics who will be exercising their freedom of religion and freedom of conscience to oppose such practices as same-sex unions (and even more same-sex marriage); divorce; multi-gender recognitio­n; human embryo research; artificial contracept­ives; and artificial inseminati­on. Already, conscienti­ous objections from Catholics succeeded in pruning the RH Law of provisions which were forcing Catholics to cooperate with the evil of artificial contracept­ion in such profession­al fields as education, medicine, nursing and pharmacy. Thanks to the conscienti­ous objections of some Catholic lawyers, the use of abortifaci­ents in the guise of artificial contracept­ives has been prevented. The spiritual and moral battle will continue along the lines described in this article. For comments, my email address is

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines