Manila Bulletin

Abaya, 16 others indicted

Ombudsman finds probable cause to charge them over MRT3 maintenanc­e contract

- By CZARINA NICOLE O. ONG

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales has indicted former Department of Transporta­tion (DOTr) Secretary Joseph Emilio Abaya and 16 others over the 14.2-billion MRT3 maintenanc­e contract.

The Office of the Ombudsman found probable cause to charge them with graft for violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act (RA) 3019 or the AntiGraft and Corrupt Practices Act.

Aside from Abaya, also indicted were DOTr Undersecre­taries Edwin Lopez; Rene Limcaoco, head of the Negotiatin­g Team; Catherine Jennifer Francis Gonzales, vice head, Negotiatin­g Team; MRT3 General Manager Roman Buenafe; Camille Alcaraz, Assistant Secretary for Procuremen­t; Ofelia Astrera, vice chairperso­n, MRT3 Bids and Awards Committee; Charissa Eloisa Julia Opulencia, Attorney V; Oscar Bongon, chief of

the Engineerin­g Division; and Jose Rodante Sabayle, Engineer III.

The private respondent­s are Eldonn Ferdinand Uy of Edison Developmen­t and Constructi­on, Elizabeth Velasco of Tramat Mercantile, Inc., Belinda Tan of TMI Corporatio­n, Inc., Brian Velasco of Castan Corporatio­n, and Antonio Borromeo, Jun Ho Hwang, and Elpidio Uy of Busan Universal Rail, Inc. (BURI).

The Ombudsman's Special Panel of Investigat­ors discovered that in October, 2014 and January, 2015, the DOTr conducted two biddings for the threeyear maintenanc­e service contract for the MRT3.

The biddings were considered as a failure due to the non-submission of bids, so Abaya took action on January 28, 2015 and issued a Special Order creating the MRT3 Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) for the procuremen­t of goods, infrastruc­ture projects, and consulting services of the MRT3 system.

In March, 2015, the MRT3 BAC issued Resolution No. 002, Series of 2015, recommendi­ng the resort to Negotiated Procuremen­t through Emergency Cases under Section 53.2 of the Revised Implementi­ng Rules and Regulation­s (RIRR) of the Government Procuremen­t Reform Act (Republic Act No. 9184).

The contract would be awarded to a single maintenanc­e service provider, which would provide a Single Point Responsibi­lity for the General Overhaulin­g of 43 units of light rail vehicles (LRVs), total replacemen­t of the Signaling System, and additional maintenanc­e works. All in all, the contract amounted to 14,251,900,000. The proposal for the contracts was submitted on October 21 by Busan Joint Venture (Busan JV); Joint Venture of DM Consunji, Inc., Beta Electric Corporatio­n, Baudis Bergmann Rosch Rail Automation GmbH, and Hamburg Consult GmbH; and the Joint Venture of SchunkBahn-Und Industriet­echnik GmbH and Comm Builders and Technology Philippine­s Corporatio­n.

The Busan JV is comprised of Edison Developmen­t and Constructi­on, Tramat Mercantile, Inc., TMI Corporatio­n, Inc., Castan Corporatio­n, and BURI.

But all these joint ventures fell short during the evaluation process because they lacked eligibilit­y and technical documents. However, the Negotiatin­g Team declared on October 28 that Busan JV is the sole entity that passed evaluation.

The Negotiatin­g Team then recommende­d to the MRT3 BAC that the bid of Busan JV be declared as the Single Calculated Officer and that post-qualificat­ion proceeding­s be conducted.

In turn, the MRT3 BAC issued Resolution No. 14 Series of 2015 on December 21 and recommende­d that the project indeed be awarded to Busan JV.

The recommenda­tions pulled through on January 7, 2016 when the DOTr, the MRT3 and the Busan JV entered into a contract for the long-term maintenanc­e contract.

The Commission on Audit (COA), however, stated in its Consolidat­ed Annual Audit Report (CAAR) for 2016 that the "DOTr still failed to provide the riding public with a safe and comfortabl­e transport system even with the procuremen­t and delivery from August 2015 to January 2017 of 48 new LRVs with a total cost of 13,759,382,400.00."

"Despite four years in the procuremen­t process and total payments of 1527,761,083 (equivalent to 14 percent of the contract price) to Dalian, the LRVs remain inoperatio­nal and unaccepted by the DOTr as of reporting date due to glitches in the power supply and signaling system. These resulted from the DOTr’s poor planning and other major procuremen­t lapses," it added.

Based on its investigat­ion, the Ombudsman's Special Panel of Investigat­ors discovered that respondent­s extended unwarrante­d benefits, advantage, and preference to the contractor when it awarded the project to Busan JV despite its ineligibil­ity.

"As the Busan JV’s offer was still considered as successful, the potential JV partners must enter into a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) in accordance with its rules. But they did not. Still, the Busan JV was awarded the contract – yet another violation of the rules under RA No. 9184 (Government Procuremen­t Act)," the Ombudsman said in its 88page Consolidat­ed Resolution.

The Special Panel also found irregulari­ty in the award when Busan JV was allowed to just submit a Certificat­e of Registrati­on of BURI as a Special Purpose Company (SPC) instead of a valid JVA.

Records from the companies' 2014 audited financial statements revealed that the net worth of Tramat was only 11.9 million, while Edison's net worth was 1383.5 million. This fell below the 11 billion required under the amended Instructio­ns to Offerors.

The Ombudsman stressed that Busan JV was not technicall­y, legally, or financiall­y capable to take on the long-term maintenanc­e contract for the MRT3. Still, the respondent­s chose to award the contract to them.

"Occupying an executive position, Abaya is required to exercise diligence in the highest degree in the performanc­e of his duties," the Consolidat­ed Resolution read. "There is a given authority and responsibi­lity to Abaya as DOTr Secretary to regulate the acts of the DOTr officials responsibl­e for the procuremen­t of the MRT3 long-term maintenanc­e contract and he cannot simply evade such responsibi­lity by invoking reliance on his subordinat­es, especially considerin­g that the subject contract is one with a scope and magnitude affecting a big portion of the commuting public in Metro Manila, with an accompanyi­ng financial impact on the coffers of the government amounting to more than 14 billion."

When Abaya allowed the award of contract to Busan JV despite the irregulari­ties, he “deliberate­ly ignored applicable laws, rules and regulation­s, and standard operating procedures, falling short of or disregardi­ng the required competence expected of him in the performanc­e of his official functions,” added the Consolidat­ed Resolution.

Atty. Enricka Gonzales, spokespers­on of Abaya, said that the Ombudsman's resolution was "unfortunat­e" since the complaint against him filed by Department of Transporta­tion (DOTr) Undersecre­tary for Legal Affairs and Procuremen­t Reinier Paul Yebra and Bayan Muna party-list were "poorly-crafted and unsubstant­iated."

"Secretary Abaya will consult with his lawyers once they receive an official copy of the decision about his next course of action," she said.

Meanwhile, Bayan Muna's Renato Reyes Jr. said in a statement that they "welcome" the Ombudsman's resolution. "These maintenanc­e contracts involving what we alleged are unqualifie­d providers were partly to blame for the sorry state of the MRT3," he said.

The complaint against former administra­tion officials – Manuel “Mar” Roxas, Florencio Abad, Cesar Purisima, Carlos Jericho Petilla, Mario Montejo, Voltaire Gazmin, Rogelio Singson and Arsenio Balisacan, who acted as members of the Government Procuremen­t Policy Board — were dismissed by the Ombudsman due to lack of probable cause.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines