Manila Bulletin

Sandiganba­yan convicts 3 ex-DOF officials

- By CZARINA NICOLE ONG KI

The Sandiganba­yan Third Division has convicted three former officials from the Department of Finance (DOF) of their graft charge involving the irregular grant of tax incentive to a bus company back in 1998.

Deputy Executive Director Uldarico Andutan Jr., Officer-in-Charge of the Net Local Content Raul De Vera, and Domestic Capital Division and Senior Tax Specialist Rosanna Diala were found guilty of their graft charge and have been sentenced to suffer an indetermin­ate penalty of imprisonme­nt of six years and one month as minimum to a maximum of 10 years.

Aside from imprisonme­nt, they are perpetuall­y disqualifi­ed from holding public office as well.

Meanwhile, the three were acquitted of their estafa through falsificat­ion charge due to the failure of the prosecutio­n to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The three former officials are the co-accused of Undersecre­tary Antonio Belicena, who remains at large. Because of this, the case against him has been archived and the bail bond he posted for his provisiona­l liberty has been forfeited in favor of the government.

The charges against Jam Transit, Inc. representa­tive Joseph Cabotaje have been dismissed in light of his death.

On March 11, 1998, the accused officials gave unwarrante­d benefits and advantage to Jam Transit by causing the approval of the applicatio­n for tax credit certificat­e purportedl­y for its eight buses, which did not really exist. As a result of the actions, Tax Credit Certificat­e No. 9461 in the amount of R6,064,669 was given in favor to Jam Transit.

In its ruling, the anti-graft court noted that the Claimant Informatio­n Sheet (CIS) submitted by Jam Transit showed blanks that were not filled in by the applicant. Basing on that alone, the court said that there existed "red flags to alert the evaluator and the reviewing officer on possible irregulari­ties" in the CIS.

At the same time, the Attestatio­n Clause in the CIS was not even notarized. The anti-graft court said that the applicatio­n should not have been given due course at the onset because of the irregulari­ties.

The defense, for its part, maintained that the documents presented should not have been accorded by the court since they were mere photocopie­s. But the Sandiganba­yan was not of the same mind.

“Clearly, some of the originals of the documents were no longer available during trial. However, the prosecutio­n was able to adequately explain the circumstan­ces of the loss in accordance with the foregoing requiremen­ts. Thus, this Court admitted and gave due considerat­ion to the copies," the decision explained.

However, there was no evidence that successful­ly proved that the accused falsified the documents attached to the Applicatio­n for tax credit of Jam Transit. The testimonie­s of the witnesses confirmed that the falsificat­ion of documents was already completed prior to the filing of the applicatio­n.

"Absent any proof that they falsified the documents themselves, they cannot now be held liable for the crime charged," the court ruled.

The 33-page decision was written by Associate Justice Bernelito Fernandez with the concurrenc­e of Presiding Justice Amparo CabotajeTa­ng and Associate Justice Sarah Jane Fernandez.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines