Manila Standard

ICC cannot order Duterte’s arrest

-

RUSSIA’S on-going war against Ukraine, now way past its second year, is not only in violation of internatio­nal law, but has also made its President, the ruthless Vladimir Putin, a global villain, except perhaps in the eyes of most Russians who apparently still support and believe in his leadership.

Putin’s internatio­nal notoriety is best manifested by the warrant for his arrest recently issued by the Internatio­nal Criminal Court (ICC).

The warrant for Putin’s arrest was issued on account of his controvers­ial order to take away Ukrainian children inside Russian-occupied Ukrainian territorie­s and bring the minors to Russia, supposedly to be adopted by Russian families.

Putin claims the children were abandoned in a war zone and his measure is supposedly aimed at protecting them from possible harm in the course of hostilitie­s.

Ukraine maintains otherwise, and the children were kidnapped to sow among the Ukrainian people.

Apparently annoyed by the intense internatio­nal public opinion the alleged mass juvenile kidnapping is attracting attention.

Putin has recently announced he will return the children of Ukrainian couples who formally request him in writing for their repatriati­on.

Whether or not Putin will live up promise is something to be seen.

At any rate, Putin’s suspected mass kidnapping of Ukrainian children is so reprehensi­ble asserts terror to his the ICC issued the warrant for Putin’s arrest.

According to the ICC, the warrant of arrest will be enforced against Putin once he steps into the territory of a country that is a signatory to the Rome Statute, the treaty that created the ICC.

That, of course, is easier said than done. Russia has responded with a terse statement consisting of two parts.

First, Russia is not a signatory to the Rome Statute and, accordingl­y, the ICC has no jurisdicti­on over Russia. Therefore, the ICC has no authority to effect Putin’s arrest.

Second, any country that enforces the warrant of arrest against Putin will trigger a retaliatio­n from the Russian military, with a hint at the use of Russia’s nuclear arsenal, particular­ly its long range ballistic missiles.

In short, Russia will not hesitate to go to war, a nuclear war even, in the event that its dictator is arrested outside of Russian territory.

Based on the foregoing, it is obvious the ICC has no jurisdicti­on over Russia and its dictator.

It has oversteppe­d its bounds, and has unilateral­ly assumed it is the policeman of the world.

The ICC’s warrant for the arrest of Putin, therefore, is absolutely baseless, and only provokes a global war, likely nuclear in character, which the world cannot afford.

It will be recalled that during his term, President Rodrigo Duterte launched a relentless war against illegal drugs in the Philippine­s.

Duterte’s war on narcotics forced many government officials to surrender and undergo drug rehabilita­tion, including Quezon City councilor Hero Bautista.

His anti-narcotics campaign neutralize­d the local drug syndicates, and the Philippine­s was saved from becoming a narco-state.

Perhaps, Duterte could have completely eradicated the drug menace, had it not been for the onslaught of the COVID-19 pandemic that drained the government’s resources.

Anyway, as expected in any campaign against powerful drug syndicates, quite a number of casualties and injuries were registered.

Eventually, President Duterte’s political enemies from the much-despised Liberal Party and their allies who sympathize with the local communists initiated a complaint against him with the ICC.

They claimed Duterte’s war on drugs violated human rights.

The confederat­e they hired as their com

plaining witness eventually withdrew from the case, and admitted he had been hired for the sole purpose of discrediti­ng Duterte.

Although the Philippine­s was a signatory to the Rome Statute, Manila has effectivel­y withdrawn from the treaty. The Supreme Court dismissed a petition questionin­g the legality of the withdrawal.

In short, the ICC has no jurisdicti­on over Filipino nationals, Duterte included.

Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla himself affirms this view. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. agrees with Remulla.

Recently, Duterte’s enemies, including detained ex-Senator Leila de Lima and some radical party-representa­tives in Congress, want the the ICC to issue a warrant for his arrest, in duplicatio­n of the warrant issued against Putin.

Obviously, they are delirious, or it’s just a case of wishful thinking on their part.

The ICC has no jurisdicti­on over the Philippine­s, like Russia.

Therefore, the ICC has no authority issuing a warrant of arrest against anybody in the Philippine­s, Duterte included.

As Secretary Remulla repeatedly points out, to allow the ICC to operate in the Philippine­s is an affront to Philippine sovereignt­y.

The ICC has no authority issuing a warrant of arrest against anybody in the Philippine­s, Duterte included.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines