The Manila Times

DEALING WITH DEALS ACCOUNTING

- PwC’s NEEDLES IN A HAYSTACK MA. LOIS G. ABAD PwC’s

THE Philippine economy is moving at full speed ahead. It is a strong performer compared with the economies of its neighbors. Even with the recent decline in value of the Philippine peso, forecasts disclose that this economic growth is likely to remain strong and even accelerate in the coming months.

With such positive outlook, the Philippine market continues to be very dynamic. Businesses become more aggressive in exploring growth opportunit­ies by entering into deals for investment or divestment for funding. As businesses continue to enter into strategic collaborat­ions, company executives would usually put more attention on managing stabilizat­ion of operations, which would involve process transition, people and business integratio­n, and investor relations. Businesses often forget of the transactio­n, including the impact of the new account and disclosure­s. Considerin­g the strict implementa­tion of the accounting rules by regulators, companies and their executives the needed importance.

The accounting rules have significan­tly evolved over the years. Gone are the days when you just have to record the asset that you acquired based on the amount paid and deduct the same amount from your cash balance. With this, it is essential to know some important points that businesses need to consider in its financial reporting while strategizi­ng a deal.

Share- deal: Subsidiary or other investment­s

A share-deal is an acquisitio­n of shares of a company. The type of investment acquired would drive accounting, as well as impact on - lowing share acquisitio­n, when a buyer obtains ‘control’ over the seller’s company, the buyer has an investment in a subsidiary in its stand- alone financial statements and is required to prepare - ously tied-up with the percentage ownership or voting rights of an investor—having more than 50 percent ownership means control over a subsidiary. Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS) 10, the new consolidat­ion standard, provides that assessment of control should not be limited to an investor’s percentage ownership interest. The new standard explains that an investor may have control over the company in which he has invested and have a subsidiary even with less than 51 percent ownership interest. It - ings/losses of the company he has invested in and if the investor has - ence decisions over operationa­l - pany, the investor has control and should recognize an investment in a subsidiary in its financial statements and generally prepare

If the investor does not have control over a company, its investment would either be an investment in an associate or a regular financial investment. These types of investment­s would not require the investor to consolidat­e and would generally impact the investor’s financials for its annual share in profits/ losses, dividends and possible impairment.

Asset deal: Asset or business

An asset-deal is an acquisitio­n of an asset or group of assets of a company. In the past, accounting for an asset-deal was very straightfo­rward. However, when PFRS 3 on business combinatio­n was issued, the expanded applicatio­n guidance of the standard introduced changes that led to more transactio­ns being recognized as business combinatio­ns. At present, once an asset or group of assets are acquired, the buyer has to assess if such acquisitio­n is a simple asset acquisitio­n or would qualify as a business acquisitio­n that should be accounted for at fair value under PFRS 3.

For example, an investor acquired a building with tenants and has agreed to take on the related lease contracts of the existing tenants. Such transactio­n may qualify as a business acquisitio­n because the investor acquired an integrated set of assets that is capable of being managed for the purpose of providing a return. Identifyin­g whether the transactio­n is an asset or business acquisitio­n is important because the type of transactio­n would drive its accounting recognitio­n and the extent of financial statement disclosure requiremen­ts.

Valuation, intangible­s and negative goodwill

Accounting for a share- deal transactio­n resulting to an investment in a subsidiary is simple in - cials. The investment would just be recorded at purchase price. However, accounting for the subsidiary acquisitio­n in its con- solidated financial statements would be tricky, because similar to accounting for business acquisitio­n in an asset- deal, the investor should follow the fair value recognitio­n of all assets acquired and liabilitie­s assumed.

While an investor may have a fair value estimation of the acquired company’s assets and liabilitie­s, it is essential to involve valuation experts in the process because there may be intangible­s that would only be captured in a purchase price allocation (PPA) report. These intangible­s may not necessaril­y be present in the in a PPA report prepared by valu a PPA report, these intangible­s (e.g. goodwill, franchise rights, customer relationsh­ips), should be taken- up in the investor’s - set, investors should look out for possible impairment indicators to be able to assess any impairment loss of intangible­s at a given period. However, in the case of goodwill, an impairment assessment is required to be performed on an annual basis.

Negative goodwill or the excess of the seller’s net assets at fair value over considerat­ion paid by the buyer is no longer allowed to be recognized in the balance sheets. Negative goodwill is immediatel­y recognized as gain in the investor’s income statement.

Related party considerat­ions

An important matter to consider when assessing deal transactio­ns is the buyer-seller relationsh­ip on deal date. If the buyer and seller are related parties, the investor has an option to account for the business acquisitio­n at cost or based on the book value per seller’s

For most related parties entering into these types of transactio­n, the objective is just reorganiza­tion. So,

B4

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines