The Manila Times

New neocon mantra: Iran, like Soviet Union, on verge of collapse

- BY JIM LOBE In the early 1980s, President Reagan shifted away from his predecesso­rs’ containmen­t strategy toward a new plan of rolling back So viet expansioni­sm. The cornerston­e of his strategy was the recognitio­n that the Soviet Union was an aggressive

WASHINGTON: Iran hawks suddenly have a new mantra: the Islamic Republic is the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, and the Trump administra­tion should work to hasten the regime’s impending collapse.

It’s not clear why this comparison has surfaced so abruptly. Its proponents don’t cite any tangible or concrete evidence that the regime in Tehran is somehow on its last legs. But I’m guessing that months of internal policy debate on Iran has finally reached the top echelons in the policy- making chaos that is the White House these days. And the hawks, encouraged by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s rather offhand statement late last month that Washington favors “peaceful” regime change in Iran, appear to be trying to influence the internal debate by arguing that this is Trump’s opportunit­y to be Ronald Reagan. Indeed, this comparison is so ahistorica­l, so ungrounded in anything observable, that it can only be aimed at one person, someone notorious for a lack of curiosity and historical perspectiv­e, and a strong attraction to “fake news” that magnifies his ego and sense of destiny.

This new theme seemed to have come out of the blue July 4 with the publicatio­n on the Wall Street Journal’s comics—I mean, op-ed—pages of a column entitled “Confront Iran the Reagan Way” by the South Africa-born, Canada-raised CEO of the Likudist Foundation for Defense of Democracie­s (FDD), Mark Dubowitz. I wish I could publish the whole thing (which is behind a paywall), but

Dubowitz, who clearly has allies inside the administra­tion, asserts that parts of this strategy are already being implemente­d. “CIA Director Mike Pompeo is putting the agency on an aggressive footing against [ the Iranian regime’s terrorist] global networks with the developmen­t of a more muscular covert action program.” Dubowitz predictabl­y urges “massive economic sanctions,” calls for “working closely with allied Sunni government­s,” and argues— rather dubiously— that “Europeans … may support a tougher Iran policy if it means Washington finally gets serious about Syria.” As for the alleged domestic weaknesses of the regime, let alone its similarity to the USSR in its decline, he offers no evidence whatever.

Takeyh joins in

I thought this was a crazy kind of one- off by FDD, which, of course, houses former American Enterprise Institute ( AEI) Freedom Scholar Michael Ledeen, who has been predicting the imminent demise of the Islamic Republic— and Supreme Leader Khamenei— for some 20 years or so. Ledeen also co- authored former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s bizarre 2016 autobiogra­phy and no doubt tutored the NSC’s 31- year- old intelligen­ce director, Ezra CohenWatni­ck, whose conviction that the regime can be overthrown has been widely reported.

But then a friend brought to my attention a short piece posted July 5 on The Washington Post’s website by Ray Takeyh, a Council on Foreign Relations Iran specialist who in recent years has cavorted with Dubowitz and FDD and similarly inclined Likudist groups, notably the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs( JINSA). Entitled “It’s Time to Prepare for Iran’s Political Collapse,” it also compared Iran today with the Soviet Union on the verge.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines