The Manila Times

#REVGOV, anyone?

- MA.LOURDES TIQUIA

decree, which replaced the dictatoria­l government with a revolution­ary government. In 1898, between June and September 10, the Malolos Congress elections were held by the revolution­ary government resulting in Emilio Aguinaldo being elected President of the Philippine­s. Have we been successful in rebooting the Philippine system twice? The answer there is no.

#RevGov is said to be the power of the people to undo what they “It is a provisiona­l extraordin­ary power to cleanse the body politic of its convoluted problems such as narco-politics, corrupt government - tion to a new constituti­on free from co-terminus once the constituti­on is approved in a plebiscite and when new elections are made under the new system of government.”

It brings to mind the social contract theorists, Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, of a bygone era. Thomas Hobbes said that in a “state of nature,” human life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” In the absence of political order and law, everyone would have unlimited natural freedoms, including the “right to all things” and thus the freedom to plunder, rape, and murder; there would be an endless “war of all against all.” To avoid this, free men contract with each other to establish political community, i.e. civil society, through a social contract in which they all gain security in return for subjecting themselves to an absolute sovereign, one man or an assembly of men. Hobbes saw “absolute government as the only alternativ­e to the terrifying anarchy of a state of nature.” He asserted that humans consent to abdicate their rights in favor of the absolute authority of government (whether monarchica­l or parliament­ary). And that is the essence of democracy and governance.

Alternativ­ely, John Locke and Jean- Jacques Rousseau argued that, “we gain civil rights in return for accepting the obligation to respect and defend the rights of others, giving up some freedoms to do so.” The central assertion of social contract approaches is that, “law and political order are not natural, but are instead human creations.” The social contract and the political order it creates are simply the means towards an - als involved—and legitimate only part of the agreement. According to Hobbes ( in whose view government is not a party to the original contract), “citizens are not obligated to submit to the government when it is too weak to act effectivel­y to suppress factionali­sm and civil unrest.” According to other social contract theorists, when the “government fails to secure their natural rights (Locke) or satisfy the best interests of society (called the ‘general will’ in Rousseau), citizens can withdraw their obligation to obey, or change the leadership through elections or other means including, when necessary, violence.”

So, are we saying government can’t handle what it is supposed to rein in? Are we saying, the opposition, through propaganda for over 16 months already, is winning the debate and the public space? Are we saying that PRRD does not have enough powers to confront the disorder, if we consider it as one? Are we accepting the conclusion that PRRD is an outlier and cannot instill discipline in our politics?

PRRD has not done any political reforms. Is he afraid to tell his political supporters that he does not want the status quo? That PDP Laban should not behave like the Liberal Party? That politics as usual is already passé? What is the counter ideology then to push for political reforms? If there is a void, center and push for their agenda? What organizati­on will assist him to pursue the “needed” reforms? The military? The police? #RevGov is easier said than done. So many fell by the wayside when #RevGov was invoked. It merely consolidat­ed the power of the oligarchy and that has been the narrative of our country since Day 1.

Would # RevGov ensure that the 24 percent who are poor are given the wherewitha­l to live above poverty? Will their lives be better off? As pointed out, time and time again, “in every revolution, there are winners and losers. Every dystopia is a utopia for somebody else. It just depends where you are. Are you in the class that does not?”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines