The Manila Times

Acknowledg­ed illegitima­te child can’t be compelled to use dad’s surname

- PERSIDA ACOSTA Editor’s note: Dear PAO is a daily column of the Public AtChief Acosta may be sent to dearpao@manilatime­s.net

your daughter is lawfully using your surname considerin­g that she is an illegitima­te child. What is granted to her by our law is not a mere privilege, but a right to use your surname.

Although we do not disregard the fact that, under RA9255, illegitima­te children are permitted to use the surname of their father, it should be emphasized that what the law allows is simply the option to use the father’s surname.

If an illegitima­te child does not desire to use her father’s surname, she can clearly do so and retain her mother’s surname. Our Supreme Court, through a decision penned by Associate Justice Presbitero Velasco Jr., distinctly explained:

“x x x The use of the word ‘may’ in the provision readily shows that an acknowledg­ed illegitima­te child is under no compulsion to use the surname of his illegitima­te father. The word ‘may’ is permissive and operates to confer discretion upon the illegitima­te children. x x x” (Grande vs. Antonio, G.R. No. 206248, February 18, 2014)

Accordingl­y, the father of your daughter cannot legally compel your daughter to carry his surname if your daughter, herself, is not amenable thereto. This is true even if her father the legal documents that he allegedly executed in favor of your daughter.

We hope that we were able to answer your queries. Please be reminded that this advice is based solely on the facts you have narrated and our appreciati­on of the same. Our opinion may vary when other facts are changed or elaborated.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines