The Manila Times

Aquino’s Dengvaxia debacle: Criminal negligence or negligent crime?

- BY RIGOBERTO TIGLAO Columnist

WITH most of the details on President Benigno Aquino 3rd’s P3.5-billion mass injection program using the faulty Dengvaxia vaccine having been revealed in the two hearings in the Senate, we can only conclude either of two possibilit­ies: that it was a stupendous case of criminal negligence or an execrably negligent crime.

Aquino claimed he had to act fast in the closing months of his presidency in order “to give a solution to the dengue appeared to be so. He added that he had his promise to leave the country better off than before he became president.

If we believe Aquino, we have to conclude that his mass vaccinatio­n program was indubitabl­y a case of criminal negligence of massive proportion­s.

How could Aquino have ordered P3 billion worth of a new vaccine untested for mass recipients—even breaking rules on bidding and the use of government funds without Congress’ approval—without asking other people, other experts other than his health secretary Janette Garin and the that involved the department­s of health, education and local government­s, there wasn’t a single meeting of the Cabinet or of this cluster. (Didn’t his education secretary, Brother Luisito Armin, a member of the De la Salle Christian Brothers who had been president of De La Salle University, care about the children under his care enough

to ask his university’s medical school about the safety of Dengvaxia?)

Rather than spending hours playing computer games, why didn’t Aquino simply google “Dengvaxia vaccine risks” in the period he ordered the purchase of 1 million doses of Dengvaxia in mid-December 2015 to the start of its injection in July 2016 to hundreds of thousands of Filipino childre?

If he had done so, he would have read the World Health Organizati­on’s fact sheet posted in that period which categorica­lly announced that Dengvaxia was not day) by the WHO.

If he didn’t understand what he read, he could have easily He would have learned in seconds vaccine means it meets standards with Dengvaxia, then it may not be safe nor effective.

If you were told that there’s this newly developed miracle drug that would make your child immune from pneumonia, but costs P50,000, wouldn’t you do some re out if there’s no terrible side-effect to this medicine, or even check if the claims of its seller are true?

Wasn’t he curious enough that the Food and Drug Administra­tion had not approved of Dengvaxia to be marketed in the country that he had to order it, through Garin, to do so in a rush?

Wasn’t Aquino curious that most of the members of the Philippine Formulary Executive Council – the body that approves what medicines and drugs the government can procure – didn’t want to give its imprimatur to Dengvaxia, and did so only after considerab­le pressure, and only for a one-year period and with six conditions? One of these was to undertake the vaccinatio­n in phases, and not en masse to 830,000 people as it had been done, so that the program can be undertaken under medical supervisio­n and the vaccine’s effects be monitored closely.

Council warned

Why did Aquino go ahead with the mass- vaccinatio­n program when the council warned that Dengvaxia may have “unknown risks which could be better managed and contained in a phased implementa­tion”?

Why didn’t Aquino even consult with his past health secretary Dr. - pointees to his Cabinet, who had been studying what to do with the country’s dengue problem?

Or did he replace Ona with Garin in February 2015 after he concluded that the respected 77-year-oldld surgeon would be unlikely to collaborat­e with him in his Dengvaxia plot, in contrast to the 43-year-old Garin who was more of a politician (a three-term congresswo­man) than a physician?

Aquino told the press last Friday that his Dengvaxia debacle was, to use Catholic Church terminolog­y, only a “venial sin” since it was done in good faith.

But if we take him at his word, he would have to be charged and put in prison, as the Revised Penal Code stipulates severe penalties for reckless imprudence and criminal negligence.

In 2014, seven Quezon City - tenced to 10 years in prison by the Sandiganba­yan for the Ozone lives. They were found guilty of graft and corruption even if it was never proven that they received bribes from the owners of the disco court explained its decision: “The slapdash approval of the building permits and certificat­e of occupancy marked by a lackadaisi­cal screening of the requiremen­ts… faith and manifest partiality to the applicant.”

Slapdash approval

That kind of “slapdash approval” of permits, “lackadaisi­cal screening of requiremen­ts”, and “manifest partiality” to Sanofi perfectly describes Aquino’s rush to purchase P3 billion worth of Dengvaxia, which is very likely to result in deaths due to severe dengue more than the 162 killed in the Ozone fire.

We will be shamed as a nation though if we believe Aquino, who obviously inherited his father’s gift of gab. This Dengvaxia disgrace isn’t a case of criminal negligence. It has all the markings of a negligent crime.

Aquino claims he just had to act fast to address the dengue problem. But why did he choose to act on this particular disease, to the extent he even violated laws on procuremen­t and the use of government funds, when dengue wasn’t, and still isn’t, even a leading cause of death in the country?

Yearly deaths due to dengue have never been more than 1,200. This is a fraction, for instance, of the 53,000 deaths due to pneumonia, and the 24,000 caused by tuberculos­is, for both of which long-proven effective vaccines are available .

Why did Aquino instead choose to buy vaccines for dengue for a mass vaccinatio­n program, and not for pneumonia and tuberculos­is, which are by far the leading causes of deaths, especially of children, in the country? Is it because many companies are producing and selling the vaccines for these latter diseases, companies which could all bid to supply government, unlike dengue which only

The $70 million that Aquino used to buy the dengue vaccine could have bought 8,000 dialysis machines so that each town in the country could have one each, which would extend the lives of the poor with severe diabetes, which kills 30,000 yearly.

Aquino claimed nobody told him about the dangers of Dengvaxia. But if he could be briefed six times on the plans to capture Zulkifli Abd Hir aka Marwan before the ill-fated operation in Mamasapano in which he inter proposals, why didn’t he heave a vaccinatio­n program?

FDA approval of Dengvaxia took barely a month, and just two weeks in Paris. He ignored the Congress that allocates to the single peso how government funds are to be used, by allocating P3 billion for the purchase of the faulty vaccine, which wasn’t in the program of the health department for 2016 or 2017. Aquino undertook a P3.5-billion program (P3 billion for the vaccine, P500 million for the costs of administer­ing it on a mass scale) in April 2016, when he was scheduled to step down from power in June 2016. He was rushing, and I don’t think it was in order to save the lives of Filipino children.

We would be pretending to be fools if we believe Aquino, just because the smoking gun of his crime—his receiving hundreds of millions to buy the Dengvaxia— has not been found. If it was indeed a crime, it was an extremely negligent one which ignored the risks to life and health of one million Filipino children.

 ??  ?? Aquino (right) and his budget secretary at the Senate hearing: Did he tell the truth?
Aquino (right) and his budget secretary at the Senate hearing: Did he tell the truth?
 ??  ?? RIGOBERTO TIGLAO
RIGOBERTO TIGLAO

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines