The Manila Times

SC to tackle petition vs Sereno

-

“I don’t expect you to appreciate

- eral will not allow you to undergo the indignity that the late Chief Justice Renato Corona suffered at the hands of politician­s who un

Sereno is expected to be asked by the high court to comment on the quowarrant­o charges filed against her.

Calida said the chief justice the allegation­s against her.

Sereno is facing an impeach Lorenzo Gadon for alleged culpa corruption, other high crimes and betrayal of public trust.

complaint on March 8.

‘Don’t stop impeachmen­t’

to stop its proceeding­s as a quo

warranto proceeding is different from impeachmen­t.

“They can proceed with their impeachmen­t. Insofar as we are concerned, proper remedy is quo

- persons argued before media that there is only one option to oust through impeachmen­t. They are horribly wrong. A lawyer who has a basic grasp of our Constituti­on and jurisprude­nce ought to know that Impeachmen­t and QuoWar

ranto are two entirely different proceeding­s with entirely different

In his 34-page petition for quo warranto, Calida asked the high appointmen­t on August 24, 2012. Calida also asked that Sereno be ousted from the position of chief justice.

“Petitioner Republic of the Philippine­s consequent­ly prays that this Honorable Court: (1) DE Sereno’s appointmen­t on August 24, 2012 as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippine­s; and (2) OUST Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno from the position of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of

The petition of Calida stemmed lawyer Eligio Mallari, who asked - tiate a quowarrant­o proceeding against Sereno.

Under Rule 66 of the Rules of Court, a quo warranto proceeding is a person who unlawfully holds a

‘No basis’

Sereno’s camp stressed that a quowarrant­o petition had no legal basis.

“The Supreme Court ought not to entertain the quowarrant­o petition for it has absolutely no basis in law and in the Constituti­on. The high tribunal should dismiss the petition outright on the basis that quo warranto is not a proper remedy. Under the 1987 Constituti­on, the Chief Justice may only - peachment by the House of Rep Senate, sitting as an impeachmen­t

“We wish to reiterate that this latest action by the Solicitor General is part and parcel of the grand plan to harass, malign and humiliate the Chief Justice to force her to resign because her detractors know that the impeachmen­t case, which was built on lies, won’t stand a chance in

Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio on Monday said the high court was functionin­g nor

Carpio told ABS-CBN News the 13 justices asked Sereno to go on

“There was discussion on how Supreme Court, how to insulate the Supreme Court from the trial, At the end of the day, there was an agreement that she will go on -

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines