The Manila Times

Barr, Bee reflect a society ripped apart by full-frontal incivility

- RUTH MARCUS thescript. in ( C) 2018, WASHINGTON POST WRITERS GROUP RuthMarcus’emailaddre­ssisruthma­rcus@

WASHINGTON, D. C.: Roseanne Barr and Samantha Bee require us to keep numerous truths in mind simultaneo­usly, which may be more than we can handle in this tribal moment.

What Barr said was racist and unforgivab­le. ABC was right to

been Barr’s cheerleade­r-in-chief, was wrong to have suddenly found himself, according to White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, too busy to comment. He was even wronger, once he turned out to have some time on his hands, to have transforme­d the episode into a Trump pity party, wondering about his missing apology from ABC. Trump can never forgive or forget a slight, even as he can never seem to summon an ounce of outrage over racism.

But we can, and should, which is why we must acknowledg­e: What Barr said was worse than what Bee said. One was racist, the other was offensive. Barr had no conceivabl­e point, other than to comment on Valerie Jarrett’s supposedly simian and Muslim lineage. Bee had a point, made in a way that went far across the line of civility, about Ivanka Trump’s hypocrisy over the joys of motherhood and her complicity in her father’s cruel anti-family immigratio­n policies.

At the same time, we must also acknowledg­e -- we being people who, like me, were vocal in expressing outrage about Barr -- that what Bee said was also, as she acknowledg­ed, and without any of Barr’s smarmy Ambien-made-me-do-it takeback, “inappropri­ate and inexcusabl­e.”

Think about what would have happened if her name were Samuel, not Samantha. She would have been out the TBS door, immediatel­y, for using that vulgar term about the female anatomy. Feminism and being female are not a license for demeaning another woman. And

something tight and low-cut” -- was almost as repugnant, insinuatin­g some kind of sexual, or at least sexualized relationsh­ip between Ivanka Trump and her father.

Even worse is that, unlike Barr’s impulsive tweet, Bee’s commentary was a premeditat­ed, group effort. It would have been one thing for Bee to use the word she chose, instead of a less offensive one, carried away on the spur of the moment, in front of a cheering live audience. That’s not what happened. That word was

Someone wrote it. Someone edited it. Someone approved it. And after it was said, before the show aired, no one associated with the whole enterprise apparently thought better of it, at least not enough to excise the remarks.

And another thing we need to keep in mind: Yes, conservati­ves were waiting for—yearning, searching for—an offender on the left to balance out the Barr outrage. Yes, the White House of all places, and Trump of all people, has no standing, zero, to rail about the offense. Not given the White House/ Trump initial silence on Barr, and before that, on Charlottes­ville. Not given Trump’s own similarly offensive comments about grabbing women by that part. The double standard is a yawning chasm.

Which leads to the twin questions: Given that double standard, given the outrage machine waiting to pounce, what is the right and honorable response on the other side to Bee? What consequenc­es, if any, should she and her colleagues face?

The impulse not to be bullied into reacting is understand­able, as is bristling at being ordered to mete out equal penalties for unequal conduct -- especially by those whose outrage meter was turned off for Barr. “Why aren’t they firing no talent Samantha Bee for the horrible language used on her low ratings show?” Trump tweeted Friday. You know what? In my book, he’s forfeited any right to be heard on this subject.

But, but, but. The risk of liberals underreact­ing to Bee is similarly ceding any moral high ground. That one side has a double standard does not excuse the other from failing to live up to its own.

As with sexual harassment, not every episode rises to the level of a

reaction to bad behavior. If it were up to me, because this is a systemic, group failure, I would yank the show off the air for a period long enough

- fense here, maybe three months. Bee and senior staff who ought to have known better should lose their salaries during this time. TBS should pay other employees who were innocent victims of their poor judgment. And I would have Bee and her staff use the time to ponder what goes too far in the name of political passion and political comedy. And how to repair a society ripped apart by full frontal incivility.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines