The Manila Times

Safety of children an afterthoug­ht for tech companies

- BY CHARLOTTE MUNNS NewYorkTim­es, UNITED NATIONS IPS Charlotte Munns, a freelance writer based in London, has specialize­d in english literature and Middle eastern studies at Columbia University, New York.

LONDON: Global upheaval caused by the coronaviru­s disease 2019 ( Covid- 19) pandemic has left society’s most vulnerable exposed. Instances of child sexual exploitati­on material (CSeM) found online have increased at an alarming rate over the past months.

The incidence is higher, the abuse is worse and the children are younger. Self- regulated social media companies are dragging their heels implementi­ng reform that bolsters the safety of their youngest members.

This recent upturn comes after decades of rapid growth of CSeM material. Interpol, a global policing organizati­on, reported a 10,000-percent increase in the amount of CSeM on the internet since 2004.

Since lockdown measures were put in place, the Internet Watch Foundation ( IWF) has blocked nearly 9 million attempts by United Kingdom internet users to access child sexual abuse websites. The vast majority of victims identified are seven to 13 years old.

Many instances of abuse originate on social media platforms. Private messaging services and children’s broad access to the internet have facilitate­d contact between victims and perpetrato­rs. each photo published online is evidence of a crime occurring, yet much goes undetected.

At a United Nations briefing in April concerning the effects of the pandemic on children, the european Union representa­tive Walter Stevens noted that the scale of online abuse “continues to expand at an alarming rate.” In some countries, such as Australia, the amount of detected material has doubled in recent months.

The Covid- 19 pandemic has brought more children home and increased internet connectivi­ty as teaching turns virtual, the most vulnerable members of society are being delivered into the hands of abusers.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said earlier this year, “government­s and parents all have a role in keeping children safe,” adding that, “social media companies have a special responsibi­lity to protect the vulnerable.”

Maud de Boer- Burquicchi­o, former Special Rapporteur on the sale and exploitati­on of children, criticized tech companies’ intentions, “the respect of children’s rights and dignity, if at all, continues to come as an afterthoug­ht.”

No company is more central to this discussion than Facebook. According to the

Online technologi­es offer more secrecy and anonymity, creating a safe haven to generate, host and consume child sexual abuse material with impunity, says United Nations expert Maud de Boer-Buquicchio. within a system called PhotoDNA allows for the detection of CSeM across platforms. If end- to- end encryption is introduced, this will no longer be possible.

Andy Burrows, National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children head of Child Safety Online Policy, told Inter Press Service (IPS) that this service “will make content moderation virtually impossible and make it easier for offenders to groom children.”

A number of leaders from countries like the United States, UK and Australia have criticized Facebook’s haste to encrypt its platform. They have called for a delay until child safety can be guaranteed.

Susie hargreaves, chief executive of IWF, told IPS, “We are asking of the 18.4 million reports of child sexual abuse material last year, 14 million came from Facebook’s platform. The messaging service facilitate­s contact between victims and perpetrato­rs, and is where images and video are easily sent and disseminat­ed.

Following suit from most other social media organizati­ons, Facebook’s plans to implement endto-end encryption into its messaging service represents a significan­t step backward in combating CSeM globally. The measure is responding to users’ calls for greater privacy, yet would prevent anyone, even Facebook, from identifyin­g exploitati­ve messages and media sent in conversati­ons.

Currently, hash technology Facebook to give assurances that child protection will not be hampered and that children and victims will be protected in some way, and as yet, none of us have seen any of those assurances.”

Federal Bureau of Incestigat­iin Director Christophe­r Wray has expressed concern that end- to- end encryption would prevent law enforcemen­t’s ability to track down perpetrato­rs of child sexual exploitati­on.

In October 2019, US Attorney General William Barr sent a public letter to Facebook Chief executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg echoing this concern, and calling on Facebook to, “embed the safety of the public in system designs,” and “enable law enforcemen­t to obtain lawful access to content in a readable and usable format.”

Fred Langford, IWF chief technical officer, in an interview with IPS praised the social media company for engaging with the issue of CSeM. Facebook has partnered with other tech companies like Google and Microsoft to discuss embedded protection­s for children, yet many criticize these measures for providing little real change.

At a meeting last month, shareholde­rs noted the severity of CSeM on Facebook’s platform, stating, “Facebook’s plans to expand end-to-end encryption will make it unable to track CSeM on social media enabling more offenders to evade detection.”

Past measures to protect children on the platform have not been effective enough, they said. Shareholde­rs requested a report be compiled detailing how Facebook would address the issue prior to imposing endtoend encryption. The board of directors voted against.

Without effective measures to protect children while ensuring user privacy, end- to- end encryption will make continuing to detect and prosecute offenders nearly impossible. Many are unsure of Facebook’s measures to deal with that.

“Tech companies have proven time and again that they are failing to make their self-regulated platforms safe for children,” Burrows said. The ongoing pandemic and Facebook’s sluggish response to concerns for child welfare on its platform may further endanger our most vulnerable.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines