The Manila Times

CONFUSED CONSERVATI­SM

- Antonio Contreras

MODERN-DAY conservati­ves celebrate small government, lower taxes and personal responsibi­lity. These are people who believe that the government that governs the least is the government that governs the best. They believe in the free market and oppose any kind of regulation. They argue that people should be allowed to make their individual choices, based on their reason to which no government should meddle.

And this is where conservati­sm is doomed to become contradict­ory. For an ideology that has metamorpho­sed into one that, in theory, privileges individual choices, it is now the powerful driver of what has become forms of blatant infringeme­nt into the rights of individual­s to make choices. Adherents to the conservati­ve ideology vehemently oppose women taking charge of their own bodies and reproducti­on. They oppose abortion rights. They also deny people the right to choose their own sexual preference­s and how to live their lives and pursue happiness. They are against same-sex marriage, even as they frown upon the dissolutio­n even of bad marriages.

Conservati­sm is in this predicamen­t simply because while it is against state control, its privilegin­g of personal responsibi­lity is coupled with their affinity for the preservati­on of traditiona­l institutio­ns such as the family and the prevailing cultural constructs. They endorse control that is embodied in law, embedded in state regulation­s, but are totally blind to the more insidious, more internaliz­ed rituals of tradition that have the power to negate individual choices and personal responsibi­lity.

Thus, we see conservati­ves sounding the alarm when government­s enact laws that would make health care universal and mandatory, and would rather prefer that this should be left to private individual­s and their insurance companies. They even refuse to wear masks or oppose any move to make vaccinatio­n a mandatory requiremen­t to gain access to certain facilities and services. And yet, these conservati­ves are the same driving force behind conspiracy theories and the propagatio­n of alternativ­e, even unscientif­ic, narratives that would oppose modern methods. They become efficient fearmonger­s as they weave narratives that oppose government interventi­on into individual choices, yet, at the same time, prevent individual­s from making rational choices.

What makes conservati­sm an anomaly occurs when one considers the fact that most problems of our modern and contempora­ry lives are due to people making irrational choices, or are products of massive market failure, or simply require government­s to intervene. The environmen­tal crisis is an example of this, where natural resources all over the world have been depleted to a point that the life of the entire planet is now jeopardize­d. And yet, you have conservati­ves who oppose state regulation of activities that are threatenin­g the environmen­t, even as they are also the most vocal climate change deniers, peddling unscientif­ic diatribes against pure logic and reason.

If there is any problem that we confront that requires concerted state action, where massive funds have to be spent and where personal responsibi­lity which conservati­ves love to celebrate may not be enough, it would be in our fight against the coronaviru­s pandemic. Yet, what we are now witnessing are conservati­ve voices that oppose mask mandates, complain against state overreach that allegedly infringe on individual rights and are against vaccinatio­n.

It cannot be denied that liberalism has its own failures. But it is equally undeniable that conservati­sm has its failures too, even more epic and more dangerous. Conservati­ves hate strong and intrusive government­s and have condemned liberals for making government­s bigger in their fight to advance human rights and developmen­t. Yet, conservati­ves are the very same people who elevate and enable strong leaders with tyrannical tendencies, from Donald Trump to Rodrigo Duterte. Conservati­ves may also hate state interventi­onism, but if there is one area where they would welcome state action, it would be in the area of declaring war on perceived enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Conservati­ves oppose universal health care and treating drugs as a public health issue, which ironically would have been more consistent with the conservati­ve ideal of personal responsibi­lity. But they would support using state resources and taxpayer’s monies to wage a drug war, even if it means killing drug users and petty dealers.

Communism is being touted by the conservati­ve right as a threat to national security. Yet, it can also be said that conservati­sm has become a threat to human security. It is the ideology that supports the violation of human rights. Conservati­ves oppose government overreach and celebrate individual responsibi­lity and choice, even as it enables the deployment of the state apparatus to inflict political violence on people who are simply expressing their individual right to

their political beliefs.

One just has to look at how the Republican Party in the United States has been transforme­d from Ronald Reagan’s compassion­ate conservati­sm of small government, lower taxes and individual choices, to what has become a political cult celebratin­g Trump, even putting up a golden image of his likeness to complete the idolatry.

The Philippine­s may not have a strong political party system, and whatever party system we may have does not embody any welldefine­d ideologica­l substance. Ideologies appear unarticula­ted, inchoate and invisible. And this is where it becomes even more perilous for our political developmen­t. We may not have the narrative of parties bearing ideologies that may have transmogri­fied into mere shadows of what they should — like what the Republican­s have become as a cult party of Trump.

But what we have is more dangerous. What we have is a political landscape dominated by a kind of conservati­sm that is already organicall­y rooted in idolatry, bereft of any history of a past that is at least doctrinall­y and theoretica­lly coherent and consistent. And in our case, it is no longer just about any political party. There is no conservati­ve political party like a Republican Party. There is just us, as we face the frightenin­g but unrecogniz­ed reality of a confused conservati­sm that festers in our entire moral and political fabric.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines