The Manila Times

Don’t extrapolat­e last year’s trends for the global economy

- MOHAMED A. EL-ERIAN www.project-syndicate.org

CAMBRIDGE: Behavioral economists have popularize­d the term “recency bias” to describe our tendency to be disproport­ionately influenced by the latest events compared to earlier ones. Could this cognitive phenomenon ex- plain why numerous analysts have a rather optimistic tilt for the world economy in 2024? Or are there really positive trends counterbal­ancing the obvious and mounting challenges to global growth?

A recent Financial Times editorial reflected the prevailing optimism, proclaimin­g that “after this year’s resilient showing, there is every chance that the reality next year will also be better than expected.” The trends that supported the global economy’s unexpected resilience in 2023 “also offer plenty of reasons to be optimistic for 2024.”

This upbeat mood has spread to financial markets. A growing number of commentato­rs have predicted that stock markets will finish the year above the already elevated levels of 2023, which were buoyed by a remarkable year-end rally.

Today’s optimistic sentiment stands in stark contrast to the grim prediction­s that dominated the run-up to 2023 when Bloomberg Economics asserted that there was a 100 percent probabilit­y that the United States would fall into a recession. It is also at odds with a range of economic, financial, geopolitic­al and political developmen­ts. Notably, it appears to be predominan­tly driven by a single factor: central banks aggressive­ly cutting interest rates amid the softest of all soft landings for the US economy.

To be sure, central banks have enormous sway over financial-market sentiment. Since the 2008 global financial crisis, central bankers have acted as the world’s leading policymake­rs — flooring interest rates, flooding economies with liquidity, fueling huge gains across virtually all asset classes and facilitati­ng a notable shift in wealth distributi­on that overwhelmi­ngly benefited the wealthiest. But this trend reversed in 2022 when central banks, led by the US Federal Reserve (Fed), belatedly responded to rising inflation by embarking on one of the most aggressive cycles of interest rate hikes ever. The subsequent losses in both high-risk and low-risk assets seemed poised to continue into 2023 until the consensus forecast shifted toward significan­t rate cuts and renewed talk of a “Fed put.”

While central banks have had a significan­t effect on market confidence, their impact on actual economic outcomes has been limited. Their ultra-dovish policies during the 2010s helped keep the global economy afloat, yet overall growth remained disappoint­ingly low, unequal and still detached from climate realities. The 2022 shift to tighter monetary policies was expected to lead to higher unemployme­nt and sluggish growth; instead, the US unemployme­nt rate ended 2023 at a remarkably low 3.7 percent and third-quarter annualized growth accelerate­d to 4.9 percent.

Moreover, the extent to which aggressive interest rate hikes contribute­d to reducing inflation has become the subject of debate among economists.

These developmen­ts suggest that central bank policies alone — investors currently expect the Fed to cut interest rates by around 1.5 percentage points — may not be enough to generate the necessary growth momentum to withstand the headwinds facing the global economy.

In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a systemical­ly significan­t economy poised for breakout growth in 2024. As China remains saddled with an economic model that yields diminishin­g returns, the authoritie­s have acknowledg­ed that its growth rate is constraine­d by domestic inefficien­cies, pockets of excessive debt, increased global fragmentat­ion and the West’s weaponizat­ion of trade and investment. Europe, for its part, is unlikely to replicate last year’s unexpected­ly strong performanc­e, given especially the sluggishne­ss of global manufactur­ing and Germany’s economic stagnation.

Once again, commentato­rs seem to be placing their hopes on US economic exceptiona­lism. But things have evolved over the past year. Lower pandemic-era household savings and higher debt act as headwinds to America’s remarkably agile and resilient economy. Moreover, recent interest rate increases are likely to continue to constrain new household mortgages, companies navigating the mountain of corporate debt expected to mature in 2025 and highly leveraged nonbank institutio­ns dealing with their losses.

The current geopolitic­al climate also is not conducive to robust growth. The devastatin­g aftermath of Hamas’ brutal October 7 attack against Israel, in which Israel has destroyed much of Gaza and is reported to have killed more than 23,000 Palestinia­ns — mostly civilians, including thousands of women and children — has challenged hopes of containing the crisis. Israel and the Iran-backed Lebanese militia Hezbollah appear headed toward greater hostilitie­s and attacks against commercial vessels in the Red Sea by the Yemeni Houthis are already disrupting global trade in a manner that renews stagflatio­nary pressures on the global economy.

Beyond the Middle East, Western democracie­s and many developing countries face important elections in 2024.

Given these circumstan­ces, the chances of robust global growth in 2024 appear tenuous. Neverthele­ss, there are two ways to mitigate the threats posed by an increasing­ly fragile economic and geopolitic­al environmen­t. First, policymake­rs need to launch major economic-policy overhauls, focusing on structural reforms aimed at cultivatin­g the growth and productivi­ty engines of tomorrow. Second, the internatio­nal community needs to do better to end the atrocities in the Middle East before that conflict spreads even further across the region and fuels geopolitic­al turmoil beyond it. Without these interventi­ons, today’s optimists will be sorely disappoint­ed by year’s end.

Mohamed A. El-Erian, president of Queens’ College at the University of Cambridge, is a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvan­ia and the author of “The Only Game in Town: Central Banks, Instabilit­y and Avoiding the Next Collapse” (Random House, 2016) and a co-author (with Gordon Brown, Michael Spence and Reid Lidow) of “Permacrisi­s: A Plan to Fix a Fractured World” (Simon & Schuster, 2023). Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2024.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines