The Manila Times

The continuing perils of the PUV modernizat­ion program

- JEREMIAH BELGICA

SINCE 2017, we have been expecting the full implementa­tion of the government’s PUV modernizat­ion program.

The Department of Transporta­tion (DoTr) issued Department Order 2017-011, or the “Omnibus Guidelines on the Planning and Identifica­tion of Public Road Transporta­tion Services and Franchise Issuance” or “Omnibus Franchisin­g Guidelines” (OFG), which aims to provide a reliable, safe, accessible, environmen­tfriendly, dependable, efficient and comfortabl­e public transporta­tion. This also signaled the push for the whole PUV industry to slowly phase out all the old and rugged units and replace them with new and modernized vehicles.

However, the program has now infamously seen so many dramatic turns and hiccups as the full implementa­tion and modernizat­ion of all PUVs is nowhere near completion. This is due to several reasons, and let me tell a few.

First is the source of funding for the cooperativ­es that bureaucrat­ic requiremen­ts have held back. The government has already set aside billions of pesos through government banks like the Developmen­t Bank of the Philippine­s and the Land Bank of the Philippine­s. However, one of the requiremen­ts that the banks ask for is the local public transporta­tion route plan (LPTRP) from the local government.

Formulated by LGUs, the LPTRP details route networks, modes and the required number of units per mode to deliver public land transport services. It is a key component of the Public Utility Vehicle Modernizat­ion Program (PUVMP). In a column I wrote in 2022, I explained that, according to the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) and the DoTr’s Joint Memorandum Circular 001, Series of 2017, the LGUs must submit their LPTRPs to the Land Transporta­tion Franchisin­g and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) six months after receiving a notice from the DoTr to begin the LPTRP preparatio­n period. This will come after they undergo training and/or capacity-building activities. This means that all the LGUs should have filed their LPTRPs in 2019. Unfortunat­ely for our transport cooperativ­es nationwide, there are still many LGUs that have not submitted and completed their LPTRP, and surprising­ly, a number of them are from the National Capital Region.

This means that the transport cooperativ­es are left high and dry because the government financial institutio­ns would not approve their loan applicatio­ns without the LPTRP, thus preventing them from purchasing modernized units, which is necessary for the issuance of the franchise by LTFRB. The Marcos administra­tion has tried to remedy this problem by allowing the LTFRB to issue an “alternativ­e certificat­e” in favor of an applicant cooperativ­e to the banks, which should already assure the banks and prod them into processing the loan applicatio­ns even without the LPTRP by the local government. However, a number of applicatio­ns for this alternativ­e certificat­e have remained pending with the LTFRB for months. These are things that may already be acted upon immediatel­y to address many of the current backlogs.

Second is the resistance of progressiv­e organizati­ons to submit to this modernizat­ion program. They oppose the phase-out of their old units and argue that joining a cooperativ­e and buying a new vehicle necessitat­es incurring debt by operators and drivers who are already financiall­y hard up. They argue that requiring them to drive within a fixed schedule, rather than the current system that allows them to work for as long as they want, is really to their disadvanta­ge. Piston, Bayan Muna party-list and other progressiv­e groups filed a petition before the Supreme Court asking for the suspension of the government’s PUVMP.

On the other hand, the larger portion of the transport sector seems to support the modernizat­ion program groups. In fact, they countered the petition filed by the progressiv­e groups and opposed the same before the Supreme Court last month and urged the high court not to stop the implementa­tion of the PUVMP. The petitioner­s are members of the Pasang Masda Nationwide, Inc. (Pasda Masda), Alliance of Transport Operators and Drivers Associatio­n of the Philippine­s (Altodap), Alliance of Concerned Transport Organizati­ons (ACTO), and Liga ng mga Transporta­tion at mga Operator ng Pilipinas (LTOP). These other groups contend that being part of a cooperativ­e would work for the benefit of the drivers since they would now be able to work with social welfare benefits like SSS, PhilHealth and Pag-IBIG. Likewise, driving a modernized and upgraded PUV could uplift the morale and safety of both the public and the transport industry.

Unfortunat­ely for those who already complied and organized themselves as transport cooperativ­es, the House of Representa­tives has opened an investigat­ion questionin­g the PUVMP, apparently heeding the call of those groups opposed to the program. This, nonetheles­s, cuts both ways as it now imperils the welfare of those who already complied, in the event the government decides to make the modernizat­ion compulsory.

Finally, a growing challenge to the modernizat­ion program is the free public transport services being given by some LGUs, which have now directly competed and are slowly stifling the viability of these modernized vehicles. There have been reports that a number of LGUs are now providing free public transporta­tion within their jurisdicti­on, resulting in a decrease in the business viability of those legally operating under an LTFRB franchise. These LGUs had implemente­d these “libreng sakay” programs to assist the public affected by the global pandemic. But these programs have now taken a life of their own as the LGUs decided to continue with the free public transporta­tion subsidy even after the global pandemic. This, however, directly competes with, if not completely stifles, the operations of the newly modernized transport groups as the riding public would rather choose the free rides over them. Without them having the expected output, their payment for their loans will definitely be in danger of default.

I hope that the president and the secretarie­s of the DoTR, DILG and other agencies will start to look into these matters immediatel­y, as the PUV modernizat­ion program remains in a perilous situation.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines