The Manila Times

Is it wise to borrow from a related party?

- JACKIE LOU A. CHUA The author is a senior manager with the Tax & Corporate Services division of Deloitte Philippine­s, a member of the Deloitte Asia Pacific Network. For comments or questions, email jlchua@deloitte.com.

WHEN operating a company, capitaliza­tion and working funds are needed for it to run properly and efficientl­y. One way of getting this necessary funding is through borrowings. Normally, a company will borrow from banks or any financial institutio­n that is willing to lend, provided certain qualificat­ions or collateral­s are offered. This route, however, may take a while to get approved.

As an alternativ­e, a company can opt to borrow from related parties that are willing to lend under more convenient circumstan­ces, that is, without requiring collateral­s or qualificat­ions guaranteei­ng the company’s ability to pay. These lenders instead rely on the related party relationsh­ip as assurance that the company will pay them back.

The question now is: Can interest expense be claimed as a deduction from gross income, and what are the requiremen­ts for the same to be considered deductible?

Based on the recent issuance of Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) 19-2024, under Section III.

A1, interest paid or incurred within a taxable year on indebtedne­ss in connection with the taxpayer’s profession, trade, or business shall be allowed as a deduction from gross income, subject to certain limitation­s, when the following requisites, provided in Section 34(B)(2) of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997, as amended, and as implemente­d by Revenue Regulation (RR) 13-2000 and Section 7(B) of RR 5-2-21, are met:

– the indebtedne­ss must be that of the taxpayer;

– the interest must have been stipulated in writing;

– the interest must be legally due;

– the interest payment arrangemen­t must not be between related taxpayers as mandated in Sec.34(B)(2)(b), in relation to Sec. 36(B), both of the NIRC of 1997, as amended;

– the interest must not be incurred to finance petroleum operations;

– the interest was not treated as “capital expenditur­e” if such interest was incurred in acquiring property used in trade, business, or exercise of profession; and

– the interest will be reduced by an amount equivalent to 20 percent of interest income subject to final tax; however, if the final withholdin­g tax rate on interest income of 20 percent will be adjusted in the future, the interest reduction will be adjusted accordingl­y.

In addition, the taxpayer must have withheld the appropriat­e tax to claim the interest expense as deduction from gross income. Further, the same RMC also provides that interest expense paid on intercompa­ny loans will not be deductible from gross income if both the taxpayer and the person to whom the payment has been made are persons specified under Section 36(B) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended.

Section 36(B) reads as follows: “(B) Losses from Sales or Exchanges of Property. – In computing net income, no deductions shall in any case be allowed in respect of losses from sales or exchanges of property directly or indirectly ... (1) Between members of a family. For purposes of this paragraph, the family of an individual shall include only his brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half-blood), spouse, ancestors, and lineal descendant­s….”

Based also on RR 19-2020, in determinin­g whether a person or entity is a related party, the following will apply: A person or a close member of that person’s family is related to a reporting entity if that person has control or joint control of the reporting entity, has significan­t influence over the reporting entity or is a member of the key management personnel of the reporting entity or of a parent of the reporting entity.

An entity is related to a reporting entity if any of the following conditions apply:

– The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group, which means that each parent, subsidiary, and fellow subsidiary is related to the others.

– One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other entity or an associate or joint venture of a member of a group of which the other entity is a member.

– Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party.

– One entity is a joint venture of a third entity, and the other entity is an associate of the third entity.

– The entity is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of employees of either the reporting entity or an entity related to the reporting entity. If the reporting entity is itself such a plan, the sponsoring employers are also related to the reporting entity.

– The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identified.

– A person identified has significan­t influence over the entity or is a member of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a parent of the entity).

– The entity, or any member of a group of which it is a part, provides key management personnel services to the reporting entity or to the parent of the reporting entity.

In all cases, the substance of relationsh­ips between entities shall be taken into account and not merely the legal form.

With the above clarificat­ions, borrowings from a related party will not be considered deductible for purposes of income tax calculatio­n even if all other requisites are met and even if correspond­ing withholdin­g taxes are remitted to the tax office.

Although it is easier to borrow from a related party, it comes at a price: not being able to deduct the correspond­ing interest expense for purposes of income tax calculatio­n. Hence, taxpayers should carefully consider their options when the need to borrow arises. For all its requiremen­ts and scrutiny, perhaps borrowing from banks and other financial institutio­ns is the smarter move compared to knocking on the door of a related party.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines