The Manila Times

China hits West’s ‘smears’ of new HK security law

-

BEIJING: China blasted critics of Hong Kong’s new national security law on Wednesday, after Western powers and the United Nations said it would further curtail freedoms in the city.

Hong Kong, a former United Kingdom colony before its July 1997 handover to China, passed on Tuesday a security law commonly referred to as Article 23 to punish five crimes after a fasttracke­d legislativ­e process.

British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said it was a “rushed” process for a law that would “further damage the rights and freedoms enjoyed in the city.”

And Australia’s top diplomat Penny Wong on Wednesday warned her visiting Chinese counterpar­t Wang Yi in the capital Canberra that the new law would “further erode rights and freedoms” and have implicatio­ns far beyond China.

The United States, UN, the European Union and Japan have also publicly spoken out against the law.

Beijing on Wednesday blasted all criticism of the law, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian telling the media that “attacks and smears will never succeed and are doomed to fail.”

“Security is a prerequisi­te for developmen­t, and the rule of law is the cornerston­e of prosperity,” Lin said.

Earlier, China’s de facto foreign ministry in Hong Kong blasted the UK as being “hypocritic­al and exercising double standards” in an apparent reference to its own national security laws.

It also expressed “strong disaffecti­on and opposition” to the EU’s position.

As part of the UK’s handover agreement with China, Hong Kong was guaranteed certain freedoms, including judicial and legislativ­e autonomy, for 50 years in a deal known as “one country, two systems.”

The accord cemented the city’s status as a world-class business hub, bolstered by a reliable judiciary and political freedoms distinct from the mainland.

But 2019’s massive and at times violent democracy protests — which saw hundreds of thousands of Hong Kongers take to the streets to call for more autonomy from Beijing’s rule — drew a swift response from authoritie­s.

Beijing imposed a national security law on the city in 2020 focused on punishing four crimes: secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces.

Since its enactment, nearly 300 people have been arrested under the law. Dozens of politician­s, activists and other public figures have been jailed or forced into exile, and civil society has largely been silenced.

‘Grave concern’

The newly passed law, which punishes treason, insurrecti­on, theft of state secrets and espionage, sabotage, and external interferen­ce, will work in tandem to plug up “gaps” left by Beijing’s legislatio­n, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive John Lee said.

The government has argued its creation was a “constituti­onal responsibi­lity” as outlined under Article 23 of Hong Kong’s miniconsti­tution, which has governed the city since the handover.

But Cameron said the fast-tracked legislatio­n undermined the SinoBritis­h Joint Declaratio­n, an internatio­nally binding agreement signed in 1984 in which China agreed to run Hong Kong under the “one country, two systems” principle.

“I urge the Hong Kong authoritie­s to ... uphold its high degree of autonomy and the rule of law and act in accordance with its internatio­nal commitment­s and legal obligation­s,” he said.

His statement also drew a rebuke from the Chinese Embassy in London, which called it “a serious distortion of the facts.”

The embassy said the law, which imposes life imprisonme­nt for crimes related to treason and insurrecti­on, “fully safeguards the rights and freedoms enjoyed by Hong Kong residents.”

“We urge the UK to cease its baseless accusation­s ... refrain from interferin­g in China’s internal affairs under any pretext,” it added.

US State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said on Tuesday that Washington was “alarmed by the sweeping and what we interpret as vaguely defined provisions” in the law.

Volker Turk, the UN high commission­er for human rights, called the law and its “rushed” adoption “a regressive step for the protection of human rights.”

The EU criticized not only the expected impact of the law on the city’s freedoms overall, but specifical­ly said it had the “potential to significan­tly affect the work of the European Union’s office,” European consulates and EU citizens in Hong Kong.

“This also raises questions about Hong Kong’s long-term attractive­ness as an internatio­nal business hub,” the EU said in a statement on Tuesday.

Japan on Wednesday added to the chorus, saying it attached “great importance to upholding a free and open system and ensuring the democratic and stable developmen­t of Hong Kong.

Japan “reiterates its grave concern about the passage of [Hong Kong’s national security law], which will further undermine the confidence in the “one country, two systems” framework.”

 ?? AFP PHOTO ?? DISQUIETIN­G DECISION
Lawmakers vote for Article 23 in the chamber of the Legislativ­e Council after the conclusion of the readings of the said article in Hong Kong on Tuesday, March 19, 2024.
AFP PHOTO DISQUIETIN­G DECISION Lawmakers vote for Article 23 in the chamber of the Legislativ­e Council after the conclusion of the readings of the said article in Hong Kong on Tuesday, March 19, 2024.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines