Philippine Daily Inquirer

Is Superman a natural-born American citizen?

- —REGINALD B. TAMAYO, assistant city council secretary, Marikina City

IS SUPERMAN a foundling? This was an issue that was hotly debated among friends during a recent social gathering. I made my position clear: The issue is open-ended because Superman’s storyline keeps on changing.

For instance, from my recollecti­on of the movie starring the late Christophe­r Reeve, Superman (aka Clark Kent) had no citizenshi­p. He was baby Kal-El, “rocketed” to Earth from planet Krypton by his parents Jor-El and Lara. He was found and adopted by a Kansas couple, Jonathan and Martha.

From Issue No. 1 of the fictional story of “The Man of Steel” (DC Comics), “planet Krypton is... a cold and emotionall­y sterile planet, an idea [John] Byrne borrowed from the 1978 film ‘Superman.’ Kal-El was not an infant sent from Krypton to Earth, rather, his fetus was placed in a ‘birthing matrix’ equipped with a rocket engine and Jor-El’s experiment­al warp drive, with Kal-El gestating during the trip to Earth. Once the rocket landed, Kal-El was fully ‘born’ on Earth. This also made him ‘born’ an American, a plot point that would be used in ‘Armageddon 2001,’ a DC Comics storyline which explored possible futures, one of which featured Superman becoming President of the United States.”

From the regular-version story, Superman was a foundling. In the “birthing-matrix” version story, he was a natural-born US citizen.

But another storyline says that Superman renounced his US citizenshi­p while Clark Kent retained it.

The storylines of Superman indeed have been way too confusing and annoying to fans like me. Superman should be categorica­l about his citizenshi­p. If he is considerin­g the possibilit­y of running for president of the United States, then he should once and for all prove that he is a natural-born American citizen, and spare his fans and foes from engaging in speculativ­e games.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines