Philippine Daily Inquirer

The most political chief justice leaves the Court

- OSCAR P. LAGMAN JR. Oscar P. Lagman Jr. has been a keen observer of Philippine politics since the 1950s.

At the Supreme Court farewell ceremony for Chief Justice Teresita de Castro, employees present quoted her as saying she “never played politics” in her 45 years in government service. That claim can only be taken as a vain attempt to negate her reputation as the judge who rose to the Supreme Court and to the position of chief justice because she played politics.

De Castro headed the special division of the Sandiganba­yan that sentenced former president Joseph Estrada to life imprisonme­nt for the crime of plunder. Soon after the highly politicize­d trial, President Gloria Arroyo, who assumed the presidency after Estrada was ousted, appointed De Castro to the Supreme Court. This led some people to claim that De Castro had convicted Estrada in exchange for a seat in the Supreme Court.

Notable among the guests at the recent farewell ceremony was former president Arroyo, the only guest from outside the judiciary.

De Castro also led the controvers­ial ouster of then Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, who opposed many edicts, orders and pronouncem­ents of President Duterte. Many law experts called the quo warranto mode used to oust Sereno unconstitu­tional. Shortly after the high tribunal’s decision, the President appointed De Castro chief justice, leading political pundits to call her appointmen­t as a reward for her oust-Sereno initiative.

De Castro said her critics ought to look at her track record, which had taken her from the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, the Sandiganba­yan, and back to the high tribunal. Indeed, she had establishe­d a record that qualified her to the highest position in the judiciary.

But one thoughtles­s act on a single day destroyed the lofty stature she had gained through those many years. That was when she appeared before the justice committee of the House of Representa­tives to testify against Sereno.

In that appearance, she gave vent to her feelings when, in reference to the Judicial and Bar Council’s nomination of Sereno to the post of chief justice in 2012, she told the committee: “She should not have been interviewe­d, she should have been excluded.”

As Winston Churchill said: “To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtles­s act of a single day.” Margaret Thatcher also said, “The spirit of envy can destroy; it can never build.”

Contrary to her own statement that her 45 years of service qualified her for the position of chief justice, many believed De Castro’s track record of playing politics should have ruled her out of contention for the position of chief justice.

Her voting history in the Supreme Court reflects a bias toward the appointing power. She voted to: •

uphold the midnight appointmen­t of Renato Corona by President Arroyo; •

strike down as unconstitu­tional President Noynoy Aquino’s executive order creating the Truth Commission for limiting its scope only to the previous Arroyo administra­tion; •

upheld Congress’ creation of a new congressio­nal district to allow President Arroyo’s son Dato to run in another district; •

dismiss the disqualifi­cation complaint against President Arroyo’s son Mikey, who ran as a nominee of the partylist of tricycle drivers and security guards; •

stop the impeachmen­t proceeding­s against then Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez, a friend of the Arroyos; •

uphold Romulo Neri’s invocation of executive privilege, thereby preventing the Senate from extracting from him Arroyo’s involvemen­t in the NBN-ZTE bribery case; •

uphold the arrest of Sen. Leila de Lima over her alleged involvemen­t in the illegal drug trade; •

acquit Gloria Arroyo of the charges against her; •

force Chief Justice Sereno to go on leave; •

uphold President Duterte’s imposition of martial law in Mindanao; •

uphold his extension of martial law in Mindanao to the end of the year; •

give cognizance to the quo warranto petition against Sereno; •

nullify Sereno’s appointmen­t as chief justice.

Whether she likes it or not, Sereno will always form a part of the De Castro narrative. Instead of being remembered as the first woman chief justice, Teresita de Castro will go down in history as the scheming woman who nullified that distinctio­n of Sereno, that she may gain it for herself.

————

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines