Sun Star Bacolod

‘CAUGHT IN THE ACT’

-

SUNSTAR BACOLOD Publishing Inc. filed qualified theft and estafa charges before the Bacolod City Prosecutor’s Office on Tuesday, April 16, against its two former employees in relation to more than P2.3 million worth of unaccounte­d advertisem­ent transactio­ns.

The respondent­s were identified as Leilanne Kho of Barangay 21, Bacolod City, and Quinly Golez of Barangay 4, Silay City.

Kho was the paper’s former business manager and had been employed with Sunstar Bacolod from November 18, 2013, until her terminatio­n on September 1, 2023, while Golez, a former marketing assistant, was with the company from May 17, 2017. Her employment was also terminated on September 1, 2023.

Golez, who reportedly introduced herself as the daughter of Sunstar Bacolod local partner Jimmy Golez, as claimed by the newspaper clients, is not related to Mr. Golez.

In the nine-page complaint-affidavit signed by Anthony Onrejas, Sunstar Management head of Sunstar Publishing, Inc. and authorized representa­tive of Sunstar Bacolod, the case stemmed from an alleged conspiracy of the two former employees in overpricin­g of advertisin­g rates and tampering with the official receipts of Sunstar Bacolod last year.

Onrejas was accompanie­d by the company’s legal counsel, lawyer Jasper Pelayo, and the Sunstar Bacolod team led by its editor-in-chief, Marchel Espina, during the filing of the case on Tuesday, April 16, before the City Prosecutor’s Office.

In the complaint-affidavit, it said that on August 2, 2023, Onrejas and Pelayo served Kho and Golez a notice to explain in writing the accusation­s of conspiracy in tampering with the official receipts of Sunstar Bacolod.

It said that the two employees tampered with the receipts given to the

clients by overpricin­g the advertisem­ent rates as compared to that of Sunstar Bacolod’s file copy, which was reflected in the Books of Accounts of the paper.

Onrejas and Pelayo also saw with their own eyes “how the pair tampered by overpricin­g or doubling the advertisem­ent rate in the white receipt compared to the corporatio­n’s file copy” after a client came by the office while they were serving the notice to explain on August 2, 2023.

“Right after the incident, Golez and Kho admitted to the tampering charges and promised to pay back whatever the damages they may have caused,” the affidavit said.

In a letter of explanatio­n and resignatio­n dated August 4, 2023, submitted to Pelayo, Golez said it was her idea to overprice and tamper with the official receipts, which she proposed to Kho.

Kho, in her explanatio­n and resignatio­n letter, also dated August 4, 2023, corroborat­ed Golez’s admission over the tampering charges. She

also pointed out that they would “try to double the price of the ad rates so that the excess amount will be divided between them. She explained that the original receipt received by the client is higher compared to that received in the coffers of the Sunstar Bacolod.”

Kho also admitted in her letter that she is part of these conspired acts since she is also receiving money.

Both Kho and Golez were terminated by Sunstar Management on September 1, 2023.

Prior to their terminatio­n, it was said that Golez did not follow the preventive suspension order by “deceitfull­y acting as Sunstar agent or employee and accepting advertisem­ent materials despite the legal barriers during the said prevention period,” the affidavit said.

Due to the unwanted situation that happened in Sunstar Bacolod, the management formed an Audit Team to attest and ascertain the level of damage that transpired from January until June 2023 in the paper, the affidavit said.

The team was composed of Onrejas and Jade Laranjo, operations analyst of Sunstar Publishing, Inc.

During the internal probe, the Audit Team gathered all newspaper issues from January until June 2023.

“Since the main issue was tampering or overpricin­g of receipts, the Audit Team carefully and technicall­y performed within the guidelines from the Advertisin­g Rates of Sunstar Bacolod. Depending on the size of the advertisem­ent, a correspond­ing rate should appear in the Books of Accounts of Sunstar Bacolod as stipulated and mandated by our rates,” the complaint-affidavit said.

Onrejas said, “First, it came as a shock since we found out that there were several advertisem­ents appearing in the Sunstar newspaper without any ad contracts. Ad contract is the main source for the client to pay for its advertisin­g obligation­s with Sunstar Bacolod. Without the ad contract, no advertisem­ent should be posted in the newspaper. Furthermor­e, if an advertisem­ent did appear in the newspaper without any ad contract, it means, no payment has been made to Sunstar.”

The discrepanc­ies or advertisem­ent with no contracts from January to June 2023 are evident in the audit findings, the complaint said, stressing that Sunstar Bacolod suffered actual damages amounting to P1,874,902.38.

Based on the complaint-affidavit, P440,758.10 worth of ads were published in the newspaper in January with no contracts; P355,341.61 in February; P491,423.63 in March; P171,522.69 in April; P134,230.99 in May; and P281,625.36 in June.

The affidavit also pointed out that as part of their duties and obligation­s with Sunstar Bacolod, the respondent­s are deemed to see to it that advertisin­g postings should be well supported with advertisin­g contracts. Further, advertisin­g postings should be properly paid for by the client.

Circumstan­ces will show that a sample of “no contract” advertisem­ents are government ads which in the most common sense will require advertisin­g contracts and being government contracts, they are requested by an office which always has the capacity to pay any advertisin­g services, the document said.

“The absence of advertisin­g contracts are clear cut evidence of abuse of trust and confidence over the positions held by respondent­s Golez and Kho. In this case, there is clear taking of money, with intent to gain, and clearly, without the consent of Sunstar Bacolod. As the same money is stolen due to a breach of trust in their respective positions, the respondent­s should be liable for qualified theft,” the complaint-affidavit stressed.

It also said that the acts of Golez and Kho “may also be a crime of estafa since they receive the money for payment and convert the same for their own use or benefit.”

On the overpricin­g of advertisin­g rates and tampering of receipts, the Audit Team found the discrepanc­y or under-declaratio­n amounting to P474,351.85 from January to June 2023.

“Taking everything in context, including the reason for the terminatio­n of employment, absence of advertisem­ent contracts, and discrepanc­ies in the recorded Books of Accounts via the Audits Findings, we can ultimately recognize that Respondent­s Golez and Kho are guilty of either qualified theft or estafa,” the complaint-affidavit said.

It also stressed that the total actual damages that Kho and Golez caused amounted to P2,349,254.23.

The complainan­t also sought the court to order the two to pay P300,000 in exemplary damages to Sunstar Bacolod Publishing, Inc.*

 ?? ?? ANTHONY ONREJAS (left), Sunstar Management head of Sunstar Publishing, Inc▪, with the Sunstar Bacolod team on Tuesday, April 16▪
ANTHONY ONREJAS (left), Sunstar Management head of Sunstar Publishing, Inc▪, with the Sunstar Bacolod team on Tuesday, April 16▪
 ?? ?? THE SUNSTAR BACOLOD team led by its editor-in-chief, Marchel Espina, after the filing of the case at the City Prosecutor’s Office on Tuesday, April 16▪
THE SUNSTAR BACOLOD team led by its editor-in-chief, Marchel Espina, after the filing of the case at the City Prosecutor’s Office on Tuesday, April 16▪

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines