The Igorot dissent

Afriendraised in our conversation about culture. Two weeks ago, Igorots in social media criticized the use of the g-strings and gongs in a recent political protest. “They do not represent us!”, most kailyans strongly proposed. “Our traditional wears are only used in celebrations”, others claimed with conviction.

For someone who once performed in Panagbenga wearing my traditional wear, it should be a double standard for people to cheer at me as a festival display, but condemn me for wearing my wanes/kobal to express my political views. Our Igorot hero Macliing Dulag protested a damaging project using his ethnic garb with pride, same with those other mountain elders in the past who opposed land grabbing and environmental degradation. It only means; “I am an Igorot, and this is my political sentiment”, and not, “this is a political statement of the Igorots”. Most of us may have read the scene wrong.

How can we forget the Igorots’ history of dissent? From the Battle of Tonglo to Galvey’s conquest? From the punitive Spanish to Japanese Rule? How can we forget our history of opposition to oppression? From the famous case of People vs. Cayat, when an Igorot was prohibited by the government to get drunk, to the protests of Trinidad School (now BSU) students against their exploitation as cultural entertainers for the Americans, to the number of cases when our great grandmothers were jailed for simply harvesting sayote in properties owned by the ‘crown’ (government)?

Why do we get angry when our colors are worn by our brothers to express their beliefs, but we get delighted when they are sold as a product or displayed as a fashion trend (or even used as a table topper)? In the words of someone from Besao; “You cannot glorify something as sacred, and at the same time sell them for profit.”

But I’m not a purist, my background in tourism and sociology does not allow me to. To become a purist and to be of this modern world is a paradox.