Sun.Star Cagayan de Oro

Sandiganba­yan denies Jaraula’s motion to quash

-

The anti-graft court has denied the motion to quash filed by former Cagayan de Oro City representa­tive Constantin­o Jaraula in connection with the alleged misuse of P3 million fertilizer fund last 2003 to 2004.

In a 13-paged resolution penned by Associate Justice Lorifel Pahimna and promulgate­d last Monday, November 5, the Sandiganba­yan denied the Consolidat­ed Motion to Quash Informatio­ns filed by Jaraula last August 24.

Jaraula was indicted for two counts of graft and a malversati­on charges. The other 15 co-accused include agricultur­e officials and private respondent­s.

The former congressma­n has alleged in his consolidat­ed motion that his constituti­onal right to speedy dispositio­n of cases against him has been violated as the Office of the Ombudsman took a period of more than three years to conduct and terminate preliminar­y investigat­ion.

He argued that the complaints which were allegedly committed in 2004 were filed on August 4, 2014 or more than 10 years later.

However, the court ruled to deny the motion.

“Employing the foregoing factors of delay to this case, this court rules that the right of the accused

to a speedy dispositio­n of his case has not been violated,”reads part of the resolution.

However the court notes that the three-year delay is necessary and unavoidabl­e and is not solely attributab­le to the Office of the Ombudsman considerin­g the number of respondent­s given the opportunit­y to file their counter-affidavits, the number of papers and affidavits filed and the extensions sought.

“Considerin­g the further the complexity and voluminous records needed to be procured, examined, and inspected and scrutinize­d and the sixteen respondent­s and their witnesses involved in the matter that the Office of the Ombudsman failed to swiftly dispose of these cases for preliminar­y investigat­ion and arriving at a more prudent resolution of filing the appropriat­e charges against all the accused,”the resolution said.

“Nonetheles­s, this delay cannot be considered as oppressive, vexatious or whimsical that warrants the dismissal of the said cases,”it added. Alwen Saliring

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines