Sun.Star Cebu

Killing us softly

- People Opposed to unWarrante­d Electricit­y Rates (Power)

Consumer group People Opposed to unWarrante­d Electricit­y Rates (Power) slammed the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) for allowing the Power Sector Assets and Liabilitie­s Management Corporatio­n (PSALM) to continue charging electricit­y consumers with a 19 centavo/kWh universal charge to pay for its stranded contract costs.

In an order dated March 6 but released only on Mar. 27, the ERC indefinite­ly extended PSALM’s P0.1938/kWh universal charge originally allowed from April 2013 to February 2017. The charge was supposed to cover PSALM’s stranded contract costs of P53.851 billion incurred from 2007-2010. But the ERC said PSALM was only able to collect P48 billion by February 2017, thus it should be allowed to charge consumers P5.5 billion more in the coming months.

“The amount might seem small, but they have been charging this to millions of consumers for the last four years, translatin­g to billions already. With ERC’s action, consumers will most likely be paying even more for the next nine years,” said Power Convenor and former Bayan Muna Rep. Teddy Casiño.

PSALM’s stranded costs are due to the onerous “take or pay” provisions in National Power Corp.’s (Napocor) contracts with Independen­t Power Producers (IPPs), which allowed IPPs to charge Napocor even for unused power. It is similar to the much-hated “power purchase adjustment (PPA)” that was abolished under the Arroyo administra­tion. .

Due to strong opposition to the passing on of such costs to consumers, it was only in 2013 that PSALM was able to get ERC approval. But said charge was supposed to have ended last February.

By extending the 19-centavo universal charge, Power says the ERC is setting a bad precedent for PSALM to charge additional stranded contract costs covering the years after 2010, including stranded debts estimated at P245 billion. At present, PSALM has pending applicatio­ns in the ERC to pass on P35 billion in stranded debts and P70.12 billion in stranded contract costs to electricit­y consumers. This will be reflected in monthly power bills for the next nine years, at least.

Electricit­y consumers are being made to suffer the consequenc­es of Napocor and PSALM’s bad decisions. The original debt to be passed on to consumers was only P255 billion in 2001 as mandated by the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (Epira). This was supposed to be covered by the sale of NAPOCOR’s assets. But the reverse happened and PSALM was left with an even bigger debt plus stranded contract costs.

Last January, Energy Secretary Alfonso Cusi announced that the Malampaya Fund would be used instead to cover PSALM’s stranded debts and stranded contract costs. “So why is the ERC now allowing PSALM to continue charging consumers for something that the government already said it would shoulder?” asked Casiño.

Casiño called on Congress to investigat­e ERC’s actions and said Power was studying options to file with ERC or the Courts to put a stop to PSALM’s charging of its stranded debts and costs to consumers.--

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines