Sun.Star Cebu

Using Napoles

- BONG O. WENCESLAO khanwens@gmail.com

Iwatched on television Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre’s press con on the Janet Napoles case the other day. After listening to him answer a question or two, I walked away. That has been my way of coping with recent developmen­ts in the country. I know that government’s plan for Napoles would only anger me, so I drive it away from view. It’s best to look for feel-good stories these days.

That time early this year when Solicitor General Jose Calida intervened in the review by the Court of Appeals (CA) of Napoles’s conviction by the lower court in the serious illegal detention case filed by Benhur Luy, I could already sense where things were headed. Government wants to use Napoles like it used the New Bilibid Prison convicts in jailing Sen. Leila de Lima.

Admittedly, I thought early on that Napoles spilling everything about the multi-billion-peso Priority Developmen­t Assistance Fund (PDAF) scam would be the best thing to happen to efforts to convict those involved in the said irregulari­ty. But it soon became clear to me that Napoles will do everything—even do the bidding of whoever wants to act as her patron—just to evade prosecutio­n.

Following Napoles’s acquittal by the CA with, I would say, some nudging by Calida, it now looks like the implementa­tion of the plan to shift the direction of the prosecutio­n of the PDAF scam cases is finally moving. I just hope this wouldn’t weaken the cases that are now in court, like those of former senators Juan Ponce Enrile, Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada and Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr.

After Napoles’s acquittal, the next move for Aguirre and company is to work to have her turn state witness. This is supposedly part of the reopening of the PDAF scam investigat­ion by the Aguirre-led Department of Justice (DOJ). How Aguirre will treat the pieces of evidence on the scam unearthed by the past administra­tion and the testimonie­s of whistleblo­wers like Luy would be a good point to monitor.

Ideally, a new investigat­ion done by the present dispensati­on would be good because of the possibilit­y the previous administra­tion of Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III may have committed, intentiona­lly or not, some lapses. But considerin­g the nature of the current government and of the officials dominating it like Aguirre, the ideal may not be achieved. That is why I am worried by this developmen­t.

Aguirre said the intention of the re-investigat­ion is to correct an “anomaly” wherein the previous administra­tion may have deliberate­ly glossed over the involvemen­t of its allies in the scam. If that is so, then I am for it. But only if in doing so Aguirre would not weaken the PDAF scam cases that are already in court.

This developmen­t, I think would be a test for the judicial branch of government, specifical­ly the courts like the Sandiganba­yan, and for the Office of the Ombudsman. It is not only the DOJ that plays an important part in bringing what can be considered the biggest anti-corruption action in decades to its completion.

The unearthing of the PDAF scam and the subsequent prosecutio­n of those involved is the best thing to happen to government’s drive against corruption. It would be unfortunat­e if this is scuttled by politickin­g and incompeten­ce.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines