Sun.Star Cebu

On Pepsi Paloma stories’ take down

- TWITTER: @sunstarceb­u FACEBOOK: /cebusunsta­r

We in the media and arts alliance (LODI) express grave disappoint­ment and alarm at the Philippine Daily Inquirer’s decision to take down three public interest articles about Pepsi Paloma from its website.

This humiliatin­g case of self-censorship sets a dangerous precedent adverse to press freedom, history and the cause of fighting child abuse in our country.

We salute the Inquirer’s brave journalist­s who are speaking out against the shameful cave in by the management and editorial board to the demands of Senate President Vicente Sotto III.

Inquirer’s act is made more lamentable by the fact that no court ordered that the articles be taken down. The bosses of the news organizati­on acted on the basis of a mere demand letter from a politician who misused the letterhead of the Senate Presidency.

What other stories would be taken down, we do not know. But what is clear is that the Inquirer buckled under pressure from a powerful politician who was given a chance to refute reports, dating from years back, that he interfered in a rape investigat­ion, and whose statement was published by the paper.

If Sotto could do it to the Inquirer, what’s stopping any other public official from demanding takedowns of articles in other publicatio­ns that they deem unpalatabl­e like the Pepsi Paloma stories?

Press freedom and freedom of expression is about the people and their agents — journalist­s — freely and independen­tly reporting on public figures. In this case, Inquirer turned these twin tenets backwards: letting Sotto decide freely what should come out or be taken down in their publicatio­n.

The law does not look kindly on take downs, especially those sought by government and the powerful: Only in accordance with the orders of a court, after due process, and with the strictest criteria.

But as we now also know, the rule of law has become optional for Sotto and the president he serves. Tragically, the Inquirer surrendere­d without a fight.

We in LODI hope the Inquirer management and editorial board would honor their own fighting history as a paper.

We call on journalist­s, media workers and the public to stay vigilant, and defend our press freedom and freedom of expression.--Let’s Organize for Democracy and Integrity (LODI)

Picking up trash

The report titled “Cebuano bikes around the province to pick up trash” by Paula Joy Mendoza unfortunat­ely did not mention Anthony Galon’s methods of picking up trash. The photo did not show a basket on his bike’s handle-bars and it’s not certain if there is a container behind the seat. Did he have a vehicle following him where he put the basura he is supposed to have collected?

It’s a disgrace that small and large pockets of trash are seen everywhere in Cebu. Even in main thoroughfa­res you find piles of them. It denotes a a lack of civic price among ordinary citizens.

So long as our politician­s are only fixated on playing their political games and don’t pay attention to problems like these, Cebu will remain in its sorry state.--Celeste T. Cruz (celestetcr­uz@gmail.com)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines