Sun.Star Cebu

PARALLEL RUNWAY.

- SUNSTAR FOTO / ALLAN CUIZON

A perspectiv­e of the proposed 2.5-kilometer parallel/secondary runway at the Mactan-Cebu Internatio­nal Airport shows its proximity to the Mactan Economic Zone 1. Officials broke ground on the project Tuesday, Jan. 14,2020.

THE Mactan Export Processing Zone Chamber of Exporters and Manufactur­ers (Mepzcem) is putting pressure on the Lapu-Lapu City Council to make a “solid stand” on the ongoing discussion­s on the possible relocation of the 150 Mactan Economic Zone (MEZ) 1 locators to accommodat­e a second runway.

Mepzcem president Santhana Krishnan Vaidiswara­n said the LapuLapu City Goverment could lose a significan­t amount of taxes paid by the locators and see about 60,000 workers losing their livelihood.

“We are okay with the idea of the second runway. It’s just the current proposal displaces the 150 locators, 60,000 employees and the whole impact on the economy. We want to understand what the stand of the city council is,” he said.

The Council position will help the National Economic and Developmen­t Authority (Neda) decide on what to do with MEZ 1.

Capsule laying

Meanwhile, constructi­on of a parallel taxiway or secondary or emergency runway at the Airside of the Mactan-Cebu Internatio­nal Airport (MCIA) broke ground Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2020. This is an MCIA Authority (MCIAA) project.

This is not the second runway whose constructi­on will affect the MEZ 1 locators. The proposal for that, a GMR Megawide project, is still under considerat­ion by Neda.

MCIAA officers, Lapu-Lapu City Mayor Junard Chan, Cebu City Rep. Raul del Mar and project contractor Duros laid the time capsule of the parallel runway, which is targeted for completion in 2022.

Vaidiswara­n said aside from the issue of their possible relocation, the looming Corporate Income Tax and Incentives Rationaliz­ation Act (Citira) is also not helping the locators decide whether to stay in the Philippine­s or move to another country.

“It has already caused uncertaint­y to current investors as well as potential investors. A lot of companies have already put all their expansion plans on hold. If the second runway will be approved and the Citira will be on the loose, a lot of companies have indicated in the survey we conducted that they’d rather... locate to another country,” he said.

Data by the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (Peza) provided to SunStar Cebu showed lease contracts of 60 locators will expire in the years 2020-2030, 26 in 20312040, 33 in 2041-2050, 19 in 20512060 and 19 in 2061-2070.

This would mean loss of business and employment as well as taxes paid to the government.

The Citira bill seeks to remove the option for corporatio­ns, including resident foreign corporatio­ns, to avail of the 15 percent gross income tax.

Corporate taxpayers who enjoy preferenti­al rates, such as regional operating headquarte­rs and offshore banking units, will now have to pay the uniform corporate income tax as regional operating headquarte­rs and offshore banking units that currently pay 10 percent.

Resident foreign corporatio­ns and non-resident foreign corporatio­ns, which currently pay 30 percent, will pay the reduced rates.

Earlier, Peza director general Charito Plaza said displacing the MEZ 1 locators would result in economic losses of P150 billion.

MCIAA general manager Steve Dicdican said Plaza’s claim was unfounded. He said there is a need to compromise for the airport to grow without disrupting the MEZ 1 locators’ operations. /

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines