PSYCHOLOGY OF USING TEACHING AIDS

Learning outcomes vary depending upon the mode of teaching applied. As most of us would agree with, we have our own methods of masticating and digesting bits of knowledge to achieve learning. Several types of conditioning are proven effective if paired with the appropriate learning tools in making concepts more tangible and engaging, thus gathering full attention from the learners.

I hear, I remember. Learning is the outcome of a systematic apprehension of the context from the sender of the message to the receiver. But what if the message was not clearly delivered? This now creates confusion to the receiver of the message. As concepts are flexible to the mind of the learner, and the way he perceive it depends on internal and external factors surrounding him. The way a person absorbs the knowledge is based on his way of thinking. This might root on past experiences he encountered. On teaching per se, some traditional ‘maestros’ are more of entirely verbal expositions when serving the lesson in the discussion, making it like more of plain narration lacking imagery and ornamental expressions. Placid, dull, boring for some.

As they say more than seventy percent of our knowledge are perceived through our eyes. Our sense of sight affects our way of thinking, we are often deceived by what we see. Visuals are more recognizable and easy to be recalled. In studying, we are more entertained if reporting sessions are inclusive with visual aids because it becomes less boring as our eyes are entertained by variety of colors, graphics and designs. Students now pay more attention, though sometimes they just stare but their minds are roaming beyond what’s beyond.

I do, I understand. Yes you have heard and saw the know-how. Not until you have done it on your own, you will never learn. The application of what was seen and heard is essential in studying. At this aspect, the act of doing it makes use of all your senses.

— oOo— The author is Teacher I at Mawake Elementary School, Mabalacat City