Sun.Star Pampanga

Helping nature: Inducing labor avoids cesarean for some moms

-

Mmedicines to make the womb start contractin­g.

“Many women don’t want all of the medical care that goes with induction” such as an IV and fetal monitoring, said Lisa Kane Low, past president of the American College of Nurse-Midwives and associate dean of the University of Michigan School of Nursing. “It can result in a very different type of experience.”

Being induced doesn’t mean moms can’t have “natural childbirth” — they can forgo pain medicine or use a hospital’s homelike birthing center rather than delivering in “an operating room in a sterile suite with a big light over your head,” said the study leader, Dr. William Grobman, an OB-GYN specialist at Northweste­rn University in Chicago.

“Everyone has a different definition of what a natural birth is,” said Dr. Cynthia GyamfiBann­erman of New York-Presbyteri­an/Columbia University Medical Center, which participat­ed in the study.

“Some women feel that natural just means delivering vaginally” and more were able to do that when labor was induced, she said.

Results of the federally funded study were published Wednesday by the New England Journal of Medicine.

About 40 percent of U.S. women giving birth are firsttime moms, and at least half are low risk — no problems requiring early delivery or a cesarean. Many women ask to be induced now, to let them plan delivery and ensure their doctor is available, but the risks and benefits are unclear.

Previous studies suggesting that inducing labor raises the risk for a C-section were observatio­nal and compared different types of women giving birth under different types of circumstan­ces. This was the first very big experiment to time labor induction for 39 weeks — when a pregnancy is considered full term and complicati­on rates are lowest.

More than 6,100 women at 41 hospitals were randomly placed in two groups: one had labor induced at 39 weeks; the other waited for labor to start on its own and were induced only if a problem developed or they hadn’t delivered by 42 weeks.

Deaths and severe complicati­ons were fewer among babies of women who were induced — about 4 percent versus 5 percent in the other group — but the difference was so small it could have occurred by chance alone. Significan­tly fewer babies in the induced group needed breathing tubes or extra oxygen after birth, and they spent less time in the hospital.

Nineteen percent of induced moms had a cesarean versus 22 percent of the others. Doctors estimate that one C-section would be avoided for every 28 women induced.

Nine percent of induced women developed dangerous high blood pressure at the end of pregnancy versus 14 percent of the others. Study participan­ts who were induced, such as Aleksa Owen, said they had less pain and felt more in control.

“I was pretty open to any kind of birth, whatever works to keep the baby safe and myself safe as well,” said Owen, a 34-year-old graduate student from the Chicago suburb of Woodridge, Illinois.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines