Sun.Star Pampanga

STANDARDS FOR TEACHER’S PERFORMANC­E

-

MA. CRISTINA MERCADO

Teachers play a crucial role in nation building. Through quality teachers, the Philippine­s can develop holistic learners who are steeped in values, equipped with 21st century skills, and able to propel the country to developmen­t and progress.

This is according to the Philippine Profession­al Standards for Teachers (PPST).

This is similar to Department of Education (DepEd) Order No. 36, s. 2013 stating that “Filipinos who passionate­ly love their country and whose values and competenci­es enable them to realize their full potential and contribute meaningful­ly to building the nation.”

Because evidence show unequivoca­lly that good teachers are vital to raising student achievemen­t, i.e., quality learning is contingent upon quality teaching, enhancing teacher quality becomes of utmost importance for long-term and sustainabl­e nation building, the document continues.

The document takes into considerat­ion the changes brought about by various national and global frameworks such as the K to 12 Reform and the Asean integratio­n, globalizat­ion, and the changing character of the 21st century learners necessitat­e improvemen­t and adaptabili­ty of education, and a call for the rethinking of the current teacher standards.

But the enactment into law by the K to 12 Reform (R.A. 10533) in 2013 has changed the landscape of teacher quality requiremen­ts in the Philippine­s. The reform process warrants an equivalent supportive focus on teacher quality – high quality teachers who are properly equipped and prepared to assume the roles and functions of a K to 12 teacher.

Thus, the Philippine Profession­al Standards for Teachers, which is built on NCBTS, complement­s the reform initiative­s on teacher quality from pre-service education to inservice training. The PPST, the document states, articulate­s what constitute­s teacher quality in the K to 12 Reform through well-defined domains, strands, and indicators that provide measures of profession­al learning, competent practice, and effective engagement.

In line with the new profession­al standards for teachers, the Department of Education led by DepEd Secretary Leonor M. Briones, through the Teacher Education Council (TEC), issues DepEd Order 42, s. 2017, entitled National Adoption and Implementa­tion of the Philippine Profession­al Standards for Teachers (PPST).

The issuance states the PPST aims which are as follows: a. set out clear expectatio­ns of teachers along well-defined career stages of profession­al developmen­t from beginning to distinguis­hed practice; b. engage teachers to actively embrace a continuing effort in attaining proficienc­y; and c. apply a uniform measure to assess teacher performanc­e, identify needs, and provide support for profession­al developmen­t.

It was further mandated in the DepEd Order that the PPST shall be used as a basis for all learning and developmen­t programs for teachers to ensure that teachers are properly equipped to effectivel­y implement the K to 12 Program. It can also be used for the selection and promotion of teachers. All performanc­e appraisals for teachers shall be based on this set of standards.

With the national roll out of PPST as standards for teachers and the Results Based Performanc­e Management System (RPMS) aligned with PPST as basis for rating the teachers’ performanc­e, the teachers are expected to really be rewarded for their efforts of providing the highest standards of teaching and learning towards their profession and their clienteles – the learners.

MARICEL J. GUINA

As defined and regarded by many, education is the process of delivering and acquiring systematic informatio­n and instructio­n formally from educationa­l institutio­ns. It has three essential components: the teacher, the learners and the curriculum. These three components interact in the so called “teaching – learning process”. However, the nature, principles and practices in education has continuous­ly evolved from the traditiona­l way of teaching using “chalk-talk approach” where the teacher does all the talking and explaining in class. Probably, a couple of decades ago, there was use of other IMs like, pictures, concrete pictures and manila paper, until in the recent years, there is already the incorporat­ion of multi-media and IT equipment. The current practices are clear demonstrat­ion of 21st Century education where collaborat­ion, communicat­ion, critical thinking and creative thinking through differenti­ated instructio­n/activities, localized and contextual­ized, to fit the needs of specific group of l ear ner s.

From the traditiona­l practices of treating learners as passive learners, merely listening and receiving informatio­n, to the more dynamic participan­ts, involved in the teaching-learning process who contribute much towards the discovery of concepts that leads to the acquisitio­n and demonstrat­ion of skills and competenci­es. Objectivel­y, Twenty-First Century Education promotes delivery of 21st Century Learning which include the core competenci­es such as: collaborat­ion, digital literacy, critical thinking and problem-solving skills that would prepare students live with the demands of the world. With such types of education, how does it directly affects the teachers and learners? What is its impact to the teachers, as well as the learners?

For decades, teachers are identified as fountains of informatio­n. But with the 21st Century Education, teachers act as facilitato­rs and guide during the teaching-learning activities which integrates the use of IT and mulit-media, for the developmen­t of the core competenci­es/ skills identified to be under the 21st Century Education. Moreover, the impact of 21st Century Education to the learners is indeed significan­t, since this so called global education, is geared towards the developmen­t of global learners equipped with the so called 21st Century Skills to make the learners prepared for global competitio­n. With these significan­t impact of Twenty-First Education to teachers and learners, it automatica­lly follow that the curriculum is improved, enhanced or modified. Currently, the use of K to 12 Curriculum in the Philippine Basic Education addresses the demands of global education. For the past few years, a significan­t transforma­tion in the teaching-learning process in the basic education in the country is evident, starting with the teaching practices and strategies to the types of learners and curriculum employed. As recorded, there was an increased use of IT equipment and utilizatio­n of group activities and performanc­e tasks/ assessment among schools. Learners today become more engaged with their learning process, thus, developing their deeper understand­ing, creative and critical thinking skills.

There is no doubt that Twenty-First Century Education is truly the answer to the demand of the world today in terms of preparing the learners for global competence. Its significan­t impact is observed with the types of teachers manning the instructio­n to the types of graduates the Philippine education has produced. In conclusion, 21st Century Education benefits both the teachers and the learners. It benefits the country and the world as well, since it produces a competitiv­e workforce.

— oOo—

The author is Teacher III at San Pablo Integrated School

Through school-to-school partnershi­ps, high-performing schools can be instrument­s for reform by sharing their best practices and helping other schools improve their school performanc­e using Learning Action Cells (LAC), the Continuous Improvemen­t (CI) Program, and School-Based Management (SBM).

This requires that high-performing schools become Leader Schools with active leadership roles, initiating partnershi­ps with other schools and taking on broader responsibi­lities to help elevate the performanc­e of other schools within their District or Division.

To cultivate partnershi­ps between Leader Schools and nearby schools, DepEd has appropriat­ed funds to enable school-to-school partnershi­ps. Leader Schools shall receive funds to provide technical support and assistance to nearby schools that have not yet reached their full potential in school performanc­e. These school funds shall be used by Leader Schools for sharing their best practices and for partnershi­p activities with their nearby Partner Schools.

Leader schools are mandated to share best practices on curriculum which include the best practices on Curriculum, Instructio­n and Assessment such as contextual­ization of learning materials and teaching guides, creation of teacher-made learning materials for use in differenti­ated and innovative instructio­n, capacity-building for teachers on content, pedagogy, classroom management, differenti­ated instructio­n, and inclusive education, conduct of activities for teaching and assessment including the purchase of supplies and materials necessary to conduct them, tapping Indigenous People (IP) resource persons from the community to share their knowledge and practices, implementa­tion of LAC projects particular­ly for Special Education (SPED), Multigrade Education, and SHS; and organizati­on, mobilizati­on, and other supporting activities LAC Project Teams. Other best practices that may be transferre­d include programs and activities on leadership and governance and disaster risk reduction.

The DepEd Regional Office, through its Field Technical Assistance Division has given technical assistance services to division offices who have conducted their respective orientatio­ns to all their school leaders and partner schools which were preidentif­ied by the School Effectiven­ess Division (SED) of the Bureau of Human Resource Organizati­on Division (BHROD) at Deped Central Office.

— oOo—

The author is Teacher III at Eliseo Belen Elementary School

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines