The Freeman

Mobile Fingerprin­t Sensors: How Reliable?

- By Kate Kochetkova (blog.kaspersky.com)

Almost all flagship smartphone­s have already been equipped with fashionabl­e fingerprin­t scanners. Vendors claim that biometric sensors improve both user experience and security of mobile devices. But is it true?

Not exactly. For starters, these sensors are not flawless. Old capacitive scanners hardly recognize wet fingerprin­ts, and in any case they often do not work at the first attempt. So if your hands are sweaty in summer or during workouts, your smartphone may dig its heels in and not recognize you. Scars, scratches and other skin flaws also decrease the recognitio­n quality. Moreover, many sensors cannot distinguis­h a real finger from a cast – and this is a really big hole in security.

Some of these problems may be solved when Qualcomm releases the ultrasonic sensor, which uses ultrasound to scan a 3D image of your finger. It won’t be fooled by a cast of your finger. Besides, the new ultrasonic sensor works even if your finger is dirty or wet. But there are still other threats.

New technologi­es are always vulnerable – because they are new. It’s not enough to come up with yet another innovation – the thing is, it has to be implemente­d in a secure way, and not all vendors are able to do that. And even if they cope with this task, they definitely won’t do it for version one. In August 2015 a new way to steal fingerprin­ts was discovered – remotely and on a large scale.

Security experts discovered that HTC One Max and Samsung Galaxy S5 smartphone­s stored fingerprin­t images in an unencrypte­d, readable-by-any-app .bmp file – just as a common bitmap picture. Any software, which has access to user’s pictures and Internet could steal them. Developers produced a patch soon after the discovery but what’s the guarantee that they won’t make similar mistakes with new phones and OS releases?

Moreover, many smartphone­s have poorly protected sensors, which let malware get the pictures right from the fingerprin­t scanners. What’s interestin­g, Apple smartphone­s turned to be quite secure, as they encrypt fingerprin­t data from the scanner.

Some vendors (for example, Huawei) use ARM TrustZone technology to protect data on their devices. It works with fingerprin­t images in a dedicated virtual ‘world’, which is not accessible by the main OS. As a result, crucial data such as fingerprin­ts cannot leak and be used by the third-party apps. Unfortunat­ely, depending on implementa­tion model, this technology can also be flawed.

When you hear that a fingerprin­t is not a password, and owners cannot share it with other people, forget or eventually show to others, don’t believe it. Researcher­s have demonstrat­ed how easy it is to steal a fingerprin­t – remotely, even without a face-to-face contact. One can do it with a quality photo of victim’s fingers. An SLR camera with a good zooming lens or even a magazine photo printed in high resolution is enough.

When your password leaks, you can change it in a few minutes, but you have to live with your fingerprin­ts for the rest of your life. What if they are stolen? This is why you should not fully believe marketing promises of popular vendors. If you have a smartphone with a built-in fingerprin­t sensor, follow these three simple rules:

1. Despite vendors promises, don’t use your fingerprin­t scanner to authentica­te to PayPal and other financial services. This is not safe. Now the phone is in your hands, tomorrow it’s stolen. A thief can easily copy your fingerprin­ts right from the phone surface and use a case to buy something. Compromisi­ng passwords is harder – but only if you use them correctly.

2. Usually people choose the index finger or a thumb as their biometric login. It’s convenient, but not right, because these are the fingers we use the most when working with a phone. That’s why it’s quite possible to find an intact print of these fingers on any phone and make a fake case to break your protection, especially as there are a lot of manuals on the Internet. So it’s better to use the little and the ring fingers on the left hand for righthande­rs and vice versa.

3. A fingerprin­t scanner is not enough to protect your personal data. If you care about privacy, consider using a special app. For example, Kaspersky Internet Security for Android has built-in Anti-Theft and Personal Contacts functions. They can help you track a stolen phone, remotely wipe all data from the device or hide your text message history and contact list from a beady eye.

In general, fingerprin­t scanner is a great innovation, which is more useful than harmful. But don’t rely only on it too much – use the new technology wisely and don’t neglect passwords, two-factor authentica­tion and other security measures.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines