The Freeman

City to allot P52.4M for landfill’s rehab

After two hours of deliberati­on, the Bando Osmeña-Pundok Kauswagan got the approval to allot P52.4 million for the rehabilita­tion, closure and remediatio­n plan of the controvers­ial landfill in the Barangay Inayawan, Cebu City that has been shut down for e

- THE FREEMAN FILE PHOTO Odessa O. Leyson/GAN

Councilor Eugenio Gabuya Jr., who heads the committee on public services and is affiliated with the administra­tion, authored the resolution.

The rehabilita­tion, remediatio­n and closure plan for the landfill include the constructi­on of two perimeter fences for P35.2 million; constructi­on or rehabilita­tion of the South Road Properties (SRP) to the Inayawan landfill causeway for P3.4 million; work and financial plan for greening and vegetation of the landfill for P780,000; recovery of facility's service area for P10 million and procuremen­t of a weighbridg­e scale which costs P3 million.

But it took a two-hour discussion to get the resolution approved as the members of the opposition expressed their various concerns about the plan.

Councilor Jose Daluz III said it would be "unwise" for the city government to spend P52.4 million considerin­g that the negotiated service provider, Full Advantage Philippine­s Internatio­nal Incorporat­ed, has not yet provided the assessment of the current situation of the landfill.

"There is no closure plan yet, it was just bided out. It would be unwise to start spending the said amount for the rehabilita­tion of the landfill," he said.

Gabuya, for his part, said that the items included in the rehabilita­tion plan are required by the Environmen­tal Management Bureau-7.

However, Daluz said he does not see any relation of the constructi­on of the perimeter fence in rehabilita­ting the land.

"I don't see any relation of the constructi­on of the fence. No fence is constructe­d by the time the landfill is still operationa­l, karon nga manira nata, mangoral na nuon ta?" he said.

Councilor Eduardo Rama said he is for the constructi­on of the fence but they need to wait for the recommenda­tion of the negotiated service provider so that the money of the city government will be spent wisely.

In addition, Councilor Joel Garganera, who used to head the council's committee on environmen­t, questions why the city needs to construct a permanent and concrete perimeter fence for the landfill, knowing that the purpose of the fence is to prevent scavengers to enter the facility.

"A perimeter fence is constructe­d to prevent access. These fences are frequently made up of single vertical metal bars. Putting up a concrete fence, murag sobra pa sa BBRC and CPDRC. Unsa mana manggawas ang basura?" he said.

Barug Team Rama affiliated councilors also questions the constructi­on of the causeway knowing that it has been already constructe­d.

Gabuya answered that they have to construct a new one that will serve as an alternate route for the garbage trucks going to and from the private-owned landfill.

Daluz suggested to change the word into constructi­on of a new bridge that would give access from SRP to the Inayawan landfill.

Other than this, Gabuya is favorable with the concerns of the opposition to conduct consultati­on with the affected fisherfolk­s and for the applicatio­n of an Environmen­tal Compliance Certificat­e.

Earlier, a number of affected fisherfolk­s held a protest after a causeway was constructe­d from SRP to the landfill.

The old causeway was constructe­d when the landfill was still operationa­l that would fast track the dumping operation.

On the recovery of service area, Gabuya explained to the other members of the city council that the upcoming service provider would clear the 40,000 tons at the threehecta­re service area for the installati­on of waste to energy (WTE) facility.

This was after the other members asked why the service area must be recovered.

Other than the WTE facility, a material recovery facility will also be put up for the reduction of waste.

In a separate interview, Daluz admitted that he couldn't understand why the administra­tion councilors can't wait for the recommenda­tion of the service provider.

"No sense ba. Ni-hire nata ug service provider unya dili ta kahuwat," he said. —

 ??  ?? The Cebu City Government has set aside P52.4 million for the rehabilita­tion, closure and remediatio­n plan of the controvers­ial Inayawan landfill, which has been closed down for about eight months already.
The Cebu City Government has set aside P52.4 million for the rehabilita­tion, closure and remediatio­n plan of the controvers­ial Inayawan landfill, which has been closed down for about eight months already.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines