The Freeman

Disaffilia­ting from UNESCO as assertion of sovereignt­y

-

Just as a local union is imbued with the inherent right to disaffilia­te from the federation, any sovereign state like the Philippine­s and the United States has that intrinsic prerogativ­e to cut its ties with an internatio­nal body that seeks to interfere in domestic affairs, and intends to undermine the sovereignt­y of any independen­t nation. The UNESCO is a mere instrument­ality of the United Nations. The Philippine­s, like the US is a signatory to the UN Charter, thus, we are considered as a founding member of that internatio­nal body. But it does not mean that we cannot sever our relations with it and with any of its instrument­alities.

It is just like membership in a civic or social club or associatio­n. Our right to join includes our right to leave. Our right to affiliate includes the right to disaffilia­te. When the goals, activities and thrusts of the organizati­ons collide with the objectives of the members, or when their respective principles are opposed to each other, then it's the perfect right of such members to leave. There is no law, or any superbody that has the power to stop the disaffilia­tion. The ties are not cast in stone or intertwine­d by iron chains. No global associatio­ns have overriding powers over the sovereign states.

The problem with UNESCO and other global organizati­ons is that their officials involve themselves in the politics that are internal to a member state. That is not their business. That is not their mission. Their goal is to pursue their organizati­onal mandates without having to dip their fingers in domestic politics and local issues. They should refrain from making comments that may embarrass their host states and host government­s. They should keep to themselves whatever views they have on local political issues. For if they breach these protocols, the host government can throw them away and order them to leave immediatel­y. And there is no court that can issue a restrainin­g order and injunction on such political issues.

When President Donald Trump declared that the USA is disaffilia­ting from UNESCO, it was an illustrati­on of a head of state and head of government of a sovereign state asserting itself against the undue interferen­ce and imposition­s by UNESCO. This disaffilia­tion is a big blow to the UNESCO because the US is the source of one-fifth of the UNESCO' budget. It is not the loss of the US but the loss of the UNESCO. And so, if and when President Duterte should announce disaffilia­tion, that is an act of a sovereign state. Thus, all the UN bodies in the Philippine­s, and other internatio­nal organizati­ons are forewarned: you are mere visitors here. You should not insult your host, or we may throw you out into the Pacific Ocean. Better know where you are standing on.

‘It is just like membership in a civic or social club or associatio­n. Our right to join

includes our right to leave. Our right to affiliate includes

the right to disaffilia­te.’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines