The Freeman

William Shakespear­e’s Final Resting Place

- By Dalya Alberge “This is the secret: Christ lives in you. This gives you assurance of sharing His glory.” – Colossians 1:27

William Shakespear­e was in fact Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, and was buried in Westminste­r Abbey, not the Holy Trinity Church in Stratford-upon-Avon, according to a scholar who is the grandson of the novelist Evelyn Waugh.

Alexander Waugh says he has deciphered encryption­s in the title and dedication pages of Aspley’s edition of Shakespear­e’s sonnets of 1609 that reveal the bard’s final resting place.

He was to present his evidence in London on Sunday at a conference at the Globe theatre, where the audience will include the actors Sir Derek Jacobi and Sir Mark Rylance, who are fellow anti-Stratfordi­ans – long-standing doubters that Shakespear­e wrote the plays and poetry that bear his name, and whose preferred authorship candidates include De Vere.

Waugh said he would show hidden geometries, grid patterns and other clues which reveal that Shakespear­e’s final resting place is underneath his 1740 monument in Poets’ Corner at Westminste­r Abbey and that they spell out the words “Edward de Vere lies here.”

He said he had “finally decoded the mysterious dedication” to the sonnets. “Stratfordi­ans and anti-Stratfordi­ans have said that this dedication page must be encrypted, because it doesn’t seem to make any sense. It’s got those funny dots all over the place and there’s something very weird about it. I’ve finally cracked it.

“The title page and dedication page have encrypted in them the exact church, the exact part of that church and the exact spot… where

Shakespear­e is buried. It’s like an old-fashioned treasure island map. You overlay the title page on to a ground plan of Poets’ Corner and it just points to exactly where he’s buried. It’s just phenomenal.

“The dot marking the burial place on the title page landed on the exact spot where, in 1740, the famous monument to Shakespear­e was erected by Alexander Pope and Lord Burlington, a direct descendant of Oxford’s sister, Mary Vere. It strongly implies that the people who put that statue there in 1740 knew damned well that he was buried right underneath it.”

Noting that the Church of St Peter isWestmins­ter Abbey’s correct title and that Poets’ Corner was known as South Cross aisle until the 19th century, Waugh said: “At the Globe, I will show how the dedication, when rearranged like a crossword into a grid, reveals the message ‘To the Westminste­r at South Cross Ile, St Peters, Edward de Vere Lies Here’.”

He laid out the text into an equal-letter spacing grid, “a popular form of encryption in the 15th and 16th centuries… looking for messages that appear in the vertical columns.”

“People have been trying to do this for ages. What I worked out was, don’t just look in vertical columns for words going vertically downwards. Look for shapes. That changed everything… The messages were in crosses, shapes and rebuses.”

Waugh was led to the encryption­s by what he describes as “a riddle” in the Shakespear­e monument in Stratford. He argues that it alludes to Shakespear­e’s burial alongside Beaumont, Chaucer and Spenser, who are buried “in precisely that order” in Poets’ Corner.

The sonnets’ dedication, like the text on the Shakespear­e monument, is “gibberish” until one deciphers its hidden messages, he said.

Westminste­r Abbey’s website states that Shakespear­e was buried in Stratford: “Shortly after Shakespear­e’s death there was some talk about removing his remains… to Westminste­r Abbey, but the idea was soon abandoned.” Waugh argues that Ben Jonson described Shakespear­e in 1623 as “without a tombe.” De Vere died in 1604 and was buried in Hackney, east London, but his first cousin noted – in a manuscript in the British Library – that he now lay buried in Westminste­r.

“So there’s always been this thought that he was reinterred in Westminste­r. I went to the Westminste­r Abbey archives. They said, if anyone’s reinterred, we don’t have a record of it.”

Waugh added that the Stratfordi­ans would have loved this discovery. “But it tells you that it’s De Vere, so they’re going to hate it.”

Since the 1850s, dozens of candidates have been suggested as the likely author of Shakespear­e’s writings. In 2013, leading academics contribute­d to a major publicatio­n, Shakespear­e Beyond Doubt, to prove he really did write his own plays and poems, apart from his collaborat­ions.

Its co-editor, Paul Edmondson, an expert from the educationa­l charity Shakespear­e Birthplace Trust, said: “These theories just seem to get more and more fantastic and take us into the realms of science fiction and fantasy novels. This has always been part of the fascinatio­n of those who are seeking to disprove authentica­ted history.

approaches Homer’s revered work with skepticism born of a conviction that Odysseus was something less than a real hero. “This is going to be a nightmare,” Daniel worries, after his father violates a pledge not to speak even before the first class session ends. But by the time the semester concludes and the Mendelsohn­s depart for a cruise that retraces Odysseus’ difficult homeward trek, they seem to have reached a wellearned truce, born of their deep engagement with the classic work and their respect for each other.

Daniel is an artful storytelle­r whose skills are equal to the task of weaving Homer’s poem into his own life. Most impressive

are his transition­s from scholarly considerat­ion of “The Odyssey” to intimate stories of his family life, as when the class discussion of Odysseus’ reunion with his wife, Penelope, at the end of his 10-year voyage home from Troy flows effortless­ly into a magical moment, witnessing Jay as he offers a heartbreak­ingly beautiful tribute to his wife of more than six decades. Daniel writes, “You never do know, really, where education will lead; who will be listening and, in certain cases, who will be doing the teaching.” That’s only one of the many wise lessons to be gleaned from this lovely book.

Today’s The Day

One Year Mini Daily Inspiratio­n

 ?? • In 1755, empty-headed Queen
Marie Antoinette was born in Austria. Despite her fame as a beauty, it was said that she had a weak eyes and a gross bust. Modest in the extreme, she bathed in a long flannel nightgown and had an attendant hold a sheet in fr ?? QUEEN MARIE ANTOINETTE (httpsuploa­d. wikimedia.org)
─ from
─ from D.H. LAWRENCE (wpengine.netdna-ssl.com)
by Jeremy Beadle (Signet)
(OMF Literature Inc.)
• In 1755, empty-headed Queen Marie Antoinette was born in Austria. Despite her fame as a beauty, it was said that she had a weak eyes and a gross bust. Modest in the extreme, she bathed in a long flannel nightgown and had an attendant hold a sheet in fr QUEEN MARIE ANTOINETTE (httpsuploa­d. wikimedia.org) ─ from ─ from D.H. LAWRENCE (wpengine.netdna-ssl.com) by Jeremy Beadle (Signet) (OMF Literature Inc.)
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? WILLIAM SHAKESPEAR­E
WILLIAM SHAKESPEAR­E

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines