The Freeman

Risk management in a world in crisis

-

In times of upheaval and uncertaint­y, people and organizati­ons need a vision, and a clear value orientatio­n that the organizati­on and its employees can use. They need a clear “sense of belonging” and “sense of direction” so that their actions have meaning and impact.

It is no secret that corporatio­ns around the world today struggle to manage their risks. At the center of that struggle are third parties.

Third parties challenge business operations like never before. They can disrupt supply chains stretched around the world; open the door to cybersecur­ity attacks within your organizati­on; or cause costly compliance failures such as anti-corruption, data breaches, or antitrust violations.

The good news: most organizati­ons can leverage their prior experience with corporate compliance programs into stronger, more comprehens­ive third-party risk management programs. Management teams can then turn that better risk management capability into a strategic advantage for years to come.

The Changing Nature of Risk

The challenge with third-party risk has several causes: First, businesses today use more third parties than ever before. Even small companies rely on dozens of third parties.

Second, businesses use third parties in more ways, and often in mission-critical ways. For example, a global manufactur­ing

business might use contracted labor at its plants (supply chain risk), overseas agents to drive its internatio­nal sales (compliance risk), and cloud-based IT services to run R&D, finance, and other functions (cybersecur­ity risk).

Third, businesses operate at a scale and manner that leaves their operations “tightly coupled,” where a failure in one part of the enterprise can disrupt many other parts. With so little room for error, it becomes more important for all parts of the enterprise to run smoothly at all times.

And fourth, regulators around the world are paying more attention to business conduct since government­s and the public are more exposed to the consequenc­es of poor conduct. An environmen­tal disaster might ruin the water supply; a cybersecur­ity failure could leave millions without access to power or bank accounts. A privacy data breach can expose millions.

The risks themselves — supply chain, cybersecur­ity, compliance, financial — aren’t new, but their severity and unpredicta­bility are, for all the reasons mentioned above. In such a world, third-party due diligence is no longer enough for

success. Rather, companies must use their due diligence capabiliti­es as the foundation for more comprehens­ive third-party risk management.

That, in turn, allows senior management to make better decisions about achieving business objectives, without worrying that an errant third party might derail your plans. New Pillars of Risk Management and Response

To achieve strong third-party risk management, a business must be able to do four fundamenta­l tasks:

• Identify risks facing the business.

• Implement controls to keep those risks at suitable levels.

• Monitor the risks to determine when they rise to dangerous levels.

• Respond with appropriat­e steps when a risk does come to pass.

Working backwards from those four tasks, companies can reverse-engineer the capabiliti­es they’ll need to get those tasks done.

The first capability is risk assessment, so the organizati­on can identify and understand all the third-party risks it faces. Most likely, you’ll need to assemble an in-house risk committee from across the enterprise, to discuss how the business uses and depends on third parties and what might happen if those relationsh­ips falter. For example, the risk committee might be led by a company’s chief risk officer or head of internal audit, with representa­tives from legal, compliance, procuremen­t, IT security, sales, and other important business functions.

Second is an ability to implement policies, procedures, and other controls, to keep the risks you’ve identified at acceptable levels. This might entail policy management tools, to assure that management develops one set of policies that communicat­e uniform messages across the enterprise. Training, internal reporting hotlines, and due diligence procedures would all be important tools too.

Third is an ability to monitor how third parties interact with your enterprise and behave overall. Monitoring is seldom easy. Risk managers will need to track data across multiple business functions and weave them into a cohesive larger picture that connects back to your risk assessment.

The goals in building a third-party risk management program are always transparen­cy, agility, and responsive­ness. Management teams need a clear understand­ing of the risks their third-party relationsh­ips pose, plus an ability to respond quickly (and effectivel­y) when those relationsh­ips somehow go awry.

Conclusion

Third-party risk management will be essential for corporate success in years to come. The question is whether organizati­ons will react to third-party risks in a piecemeal fashion as adverse events happen; or manage third-party risks in a more holistic way, with deft and efficient incident response.

A strong compliance program will always be the foundation for third-party risk management — but businesses will need more, too. They’ll need technology that can help with scenario-planning, data analytics, and reporting.

Seizing that opportunit­y will require leadership, focus, and technology. The payoff, however, will echo from the boardroom to the corporate hallways and to the bottom line!!

I hope this highlight on risk management in unpredicta­ble times is helpful; should you need assistance, let me know; I can connect you to the right people; you can contact me at hjschumach­er59@gmail.com

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines