The Freeman

SC imposes jail term, fine on child ‘pornograph­er’

-

MANILA --- The Supreme Court (SC) upheld a ruling that found an individual guilty of violating the Anti-Child Pornograph­y Act of 2009.

The individual faces a maximum sentence of 40 years imprisonme­nt and a fine of two million pesos.

In a ruling penned by Associate Justice Mario Lopez, the high court denied the appeal of Luisa Pineda, who was convicted both by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) and the Court of Appeals (CA) for child pornograph­y qualified with the use of a computer system.

The case stemmed when police officers acted on a tip from the Federal Bureau of Investigat­ion of the United States. They discovered a computer and a cell phone at Pineda’s residence, containing explicit photos and videos of her six-year-old niece.

The child was left under Pineda’s custody after her parents separated, according to the SC, citing the police officers. The child also narrated that Pineda ordered her “to enter a room, remove her clothes and stand naked in front of a computer monitor with a webcam where her private parts were exposed to an unidentifi­ed old man.”

Pineda faced charges for violating both the Anti-Child Pornograph­y Act of 2009 and the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) and the Court of Appeals (CA) both found her guilty, leading Pineda to file an appeal in the higher court.

In her appeal, the SC discussed the effect of the subsequent enactment of RA 11930 or the Anti-Online Sexual Abuse of Exploitati­on of Children (OSAEC) and Anti-Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitati­on Materials Act (CSAEM) which repealed the Anti-Child Pornograph­y Act of 2009.

If a penal law is fully repealed, courts can’t punish someone charged under the old law before its repeal.

In such cases, the offense is treated as if it never existed, as if the person accused of committing it never actually did so, according to the high court.

However, it specified that the exception to this rule arises when the repealing law reinstates the former statute and imposes penalties for the same act that was previously penalized under the old law. -

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines