The Philippine Star

Body fat and cardiovasc­ular risk? Location, location!

- By CHARLES C. CHANTE, MD

It’s not obesity per se that affects cardiovasc­ular risk, it’s ‘Where that excess body fat is stored, according to the results of a novel adipose tissue-imagine study.

Excess visceral adipose tissue is independen­tly associated with increased risk of developing cardiovasc­ular disease. In contrast, increased lower body subcutaneo­us adipose tissue — that is, fat around the hips and a big butt — actually seems to protect against cardiovasc­ular disease, reported at the American Heart Associatio­n scientific sessions.

He presented an analysis of 972 obese participan­ts in the Dallas Heart Study with a mean age of 44 years at enrollment and no baseline cardiovasc­ular disease. All underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiom­etry and MRI assessment of their body fat distributi­on, focusing on the visceral, abdominal subcutaneo­us and lower body subcutaneo­us adipose tissue depots. Participan­ts were then followed prospectiv­ely for a median 8.1 years, during which 91 cardiovasc­ular events occurred in 68 subjects.

The impetus for the adipose tissue imaging study was the researcher’s recognitio­n that obesity is a heterogene­ous disorder.

“Currently, we know that obesity associated with incident cardiovasc­ular disease at a general population level. However, body mass index alone is really an inadequate marker of risk among the obese. Many individual­s with even high BMIs do not develop cardiovasc­ular disease. Marked abdominal obesity is a stronger predictor of cardiovasc­ular disease but still lacks the necessary specificit­y,” explained by a fellow in cardiovasc­ular medicine at the University of Texas Southweste­rn Medical center, Dallas. “So, there’s really a clinical need for tools to differenti­ate obese individual­s who will develop cardiovasc­ular disease from those who will be free of cardiovasc­ular disease.”

In a multivaria­te analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, and the convention­al cardiovasc­ular risk factors, each 1- standard deviation increase in visceral adipose tissue was independen­tly associated with a 24% increase in the risk of developing cardiovasc­ular disease during follow-up. Dividing the study of population into quartiles on the basis of their extent, of visceral adipose tissue, the cumulative incidence of cardiovasc­ular disease rose in stepwise fashion, with subjects in the lowest quartile having the least cardiovasc­ular events and those in the top quartile having the most.

Having lower body subcutaneo­us fat had the opposite effect. For every 1- standard deviation increase in fat at that location, the cardiovasc­ular event risk dropped by 27%.

The amount of abdominal subcutaneo­us fat didn’t affect cardiovasc­ular event risk one way or another. Nor did BMI, waist circumfere­nce, waisthip ratio, or the amount of liver fat on MRI show any significan­t associatio­n with cardiovasc­ular disease risk.

These results really underscore the biologic importance of body fat distributi­on with regard to cardiovasc­ular disease risk in obesity and suggest a possible prognostic role for imaging-based assessment of body fat distributi­on in high-risk obese patients.

One intriguing clinical implicatio­n of this study is that preventing accumulati­on of visceral adipose tissue may have benefit in terms of cardiovasc­ular disease prevention even in the absence of meaningful weight loss. It’s possible that new drugs could be developed that lower cardiovasc­ular risk in obese patients by changing their body fat distributi­on profile rather than lopping off pounds.

In the Dallas study, increased visceral abdominal tissue was consistent­ly associated with a higher risk of cardiovasc­ular disease across subgroups based upon age, race, sex, and BMI.

Those with increased visceral abdominal fat who were less than 40 years of age had greater risk for cardiovasc­ular disease than [did] those over 40. This could suggest that visceral abdominal tissue has a greater impact on the young.

The cardiovasc­ular event endpoint in the study was a composite of cardiovasc­ular death, acute MI, stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillati­on, or event-driven coronary or peripheral artery revascular­ization.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines