The Philippine Star

Trump would favor provisiona­l waiver

- MICHAEL J. GURFINKEL, ESQ WEBSITE: www.gurfinkel.com Follow us on Facebook.com/GurfinkelL­aw and Twitter @GurfinkelL­aw Four offices to serve you: PHILIPPINE­S: 8940258 or 8940239; LOS ANGELES; SAN FRANCISCO; NEW YORK: TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-GURFINKEL (1-

Aprovision­al waiver can benefit certain people who are not eligible to adjust status in the US. These people include:

• Crewmen without the benefit of section 245(i), which was a law that expired on April 30, 2001, allowing crewmen and others to still adjust status in the US if they were petitioned before that date.

• People who entered on fiancée visas (K-1) but did not marry the American who petitioned them.

• People who are out of status, and do not have the benefit of Section 245(i).

• People who entered the US without inspection and do not have the benefit of Section 245(i).

Since these people are not eligible to adjust status in the US, they would be required to return to their home country and apply for an immigrant visa abroad. However, there is a different immigratio­n law which provides that if a person is out of status for more than one year and departs the US, even to obtain their immigrant visa abroad, they could be subject to a 10-year bar.

The provisiona­l waiver forgives or “waives” the 10-year bar, and can be applied for while the person is still in the US, and before they depart, provided that:

• They have an immigrant visa immediatel­y available to them, whether through a family petition or employer sponsorshi­p. That means the priority date on their case must be current. (Of course, if they are being petitioned by a US citizen spouse or child, the visa would always be available.)

• They demonstrat­e that a parent or spouse who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident would suffer “extreme hardship” if the provisiona­l waiver is not granted.

• The only immigratio­n violation they have is overstayin­g. If they have any fraud, misreprese­ntation, crimes, etc., they may not be eligible for the provisiona­l waiver.

Despite the availabili­ty of this remedy, many people are still reluctant to avail of provisiona­l waiver because of President Trump’s election and his promise to deport undocument­ed immigrants. However, I believe Pres. Trump would be in favor of, and endorse, the provisiona­l waiver.

If you recall, when Trump was first running for president, he stated that “We have at least 11 million people that came in illegally. They will go out. Some will come back, the best, through a process. They have to come back legally.” What Trump was describing was effectivel­y the provisiona­l waiver! So why would he oppose something that he had been endorsing from the outset: people will go out (to apply for immigrant visa processing), and then they will come back as lawful permanent residents. Moreover, they will be “the best” or “the good ones,” because eligibilit­y for the provisiona­l waiver is based on a person having no crimes or fraud. The sole violation is overstayin­g. Moreover, they must go through a background check in the US, including fingerprin­ts, as part of the approval process for the provisiona­l waiver.

Moreover, the provisiona­l waiver regu- lations provide for “confidenti­ality” even if the provisiona­l waiver is withdrawn or denied (provided the person is not an enforcemen­t priority, such as a terrorist, gang member, or criminal.) This means, the government has stated it will not come after people even if the provisiona­l waiver is denied.

If you are eligible for a provisiona­l waiver, and were reluctant to apply out of fear that Trump was against the provisiona­l waiver, you can see that Trump, in his own words, favors or endorses the provisiona­l waiver. If you think you may be eligible, you should seek the advice of an attorney who can fully evaluate your situation and perhaps help you apply for a provisiona­l waiver.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines