The Philippine Star

‘Colorum’ Grab, Uber drivers get temporary reprieve

- By JANVIC MATEO

Drivers of transport network vehicle service (TNVS) applicatio­ns such as Grab and Uber will be allowed to continue operating even without provisiona­l authority and franchise pending a ruling on the appeal that would be filed before the Land Transporta­tion Franchisin­g and Regulatory Board (LTFRB).

“The filing of a motion for reconsider­ation technicall­y holds in abeyance whatever order is in place because it is not yet final, because the other pleading has to be settled first,” LTFRB board member and spokespers­on Aileen Lizada said yesterday.

She said transport network companies (TNCs) such as Grab, Uber and U-Hop have until July 26 to file an appeal on the July 11 order that directed them to deactivate all drivers without

provisiona­l authority or franchise.

The announceme­nt came after a meeting between representa­tives of the LTFRB and the TNCs in the presence of Senate committee on public services chair Sen. Grace Poe and vice chairman Sen. Joseph Victor Ejercito.

Grab Philippine­s country head Brian Cu said they will file their motion for reconsider­ation today.

“We thank the LTFRB for convening us to discuss the July 11 order. Grab is filing a motion for reconsider­ation (on Thursday) which will start the process for further discussion on resolving the issues on colorum drivers,” said Cu.

A separate statement from the office of Poe also confirmed that drivers with no provisiona­l authority and franchise would be allowed to continue providing service pending the resolution of the appeal.

Poe said parties involved agreed to continue working together in order to find a win-win solution on the situation.

LTFRB drew flak from consumers after it ordered the deactivati­on of thousands of drivers without provisiona­l authoritie­s or franchises.

The order was expected to significan­tly affect the operations of the popular mode of transporta­tion in Metro Manila and other urban areas in the country.

Following the announceme­nt, finger pointing ensued, with the TNCs claiming that the lack of provisiona­l authority was due to the failure of the LTFRB to process requests for extension and accept new applicatio­ns.

Senate, House bills

Poe had filed Senate Bill 1501 that seeks to set clear and standard guidelines for the operation of TNCs as a new mode of public transport.

The bill provides for the procedures in acquiring permits from the LTFRB, which would be valid for two years from date of issue.

Provisions regarding the safety of passengers, an issue repeatedly raised against TNCs, were also included in the bill, including the posting of the photograph of the driver, license plate number, registrati­on number and descriptio­n of the vehicle through the service platform.

To ensure that TNCs remain true to their descriptio­n as a ride-sharing service, the bill prohibits the TNCs from having their own fleet service.

The bill also specifies the powers of the LTFRB board with regard to the operation of TNCs.

Davao City Rep. Karlo Nograles and his brother Puwersa ng Bayaning Atleta party-list group Rep. Jericho Nograles filed a bill that would regulate and set standards and parameters for the operation of Uber and Grab.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines