The Philippine Star

The end of DACA

-

On Sept. 5, 2017, Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions announced Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is being rescinded or canceled. DHS also issued a memo and FAQ’s, further detailing the winding down of DACA. However, there is a sixmonth “grace period” until March 5, 2018, in order to give Congress the opportunit­y to pass legislatio­n benefiting young people who were brought into the US at an early age. Let us hope Congress finally passes the DREAM Act.

Under the DHS memo and FAQ’s, the following steps will be taken to end the DACA program:

• People currently under DACA will be allowed to keep their work authorizat­ions until they expire.

• No new DACA applicatio­ns will be accepted; only renewals in certain circumstan­ces.

• DACA recipients with work permits set to expire on or before March 5, 2018 may apply for a two-year “final” renewal, if the renewal is filed by Oct. 5, 2017.

• USCIS will not renew work authorizat­ions for any applicatio­n received after Oct. 5, 2017, or if a DACA recipient’s work authorizat­ion will expire after March 5, 2018.

• USCIS will not approve any DACA-based applicatio­ns for advance parole (or permission to travel outside the US). Any applicatio­n for advance parole that has already been filed, but not acted upon by the USCIS, will be closed/rejected and the filing fee will be refunded.

• Any advance parole already granted will be honored until its expiration date. However, even if a person has a currently valid advance parole, the memo notes that “CBP retains the right to refuse admission to a person who presents themselves at a port of entry as a matter of discretion.” In other words, even if a person had been granted advance parole and travels outside the US during its validity period, CBP at the airport could still possibly deny them reentry into the US.

In justifying the end to DACA, Atty. Gen. Sessions stated the original DACA program was an unconstitu­tional overreach of presidenti­al authority by former President Obama. Under the Constituti­on, it is Congress which passes laws on immigratio­n, not the president. Therefore, if there is to be any kind of relief for the Dreamers, it must be by way of a law passed by Congress, not through presidenti­al executive action.

People who still have valid DACA and work authorizat­ion should not be targeted for arrest or removal, unless they violate the conditions of DACA, such as committing a crime or joining a gang, etc.

As for those whose DACA grants that have expired (or will eventually expire), DHS notes in a FAQ issued on Sept. 5, 2017:

• DACA never granted “any legal status,” to the recipients. They were still considered “unlawfully present in the US,” with their removal deferred. When their DACA expires, “their removal will no longer be deferred and they will no longer be eligible for lawful employment.”

• Informatio­n provided to USCIS in DACA requests will not be proactivel­y provided to ICE and CBP for the purpose of immigratio­n enforcemen­t, unless the person is considered to be an “enforcemen­t priority,” such as a felon or terrorist, etc. However, this policy “may be modified, superseded, or rescinded at any time without notice…”

Now, it will be up to Congress to come up with legislatio­n, such as the DREAM Act during the next six months, and people should be urging their senators and congressme­n to work fast to pass such a law. And I know Congress is capable of quickly passing laws. For example, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Congress was able to enact the USA Patriot Act within two months. That law was hundreds of pages long. So they could certainly pass something as simple as the DREAM Act, especially since various forms of that proposal have been introduced for the last 15 years. And there was a new version introduced in July 2017.

Even with the end of DACA, there could still possibly be other forms of relief available to these young people. For example, I had featured young DACA recipients on my television show Citizen Pinoy, when DACA was originally introduced back in 2012. By sheer coincidenc­e (and miracle), their green cards were APPROVED the same day Atty. Gen. Sessions announced the end to DACA, as they were derivative beneficiar­ies of their father’s employment­based petition.

There can also be other types of benefits or forms of relief available. However, I would strongly advise people to seek the advice of an attorney, who can evaluate your situation and determine if you are eligible for any other kind of immigratio­n benefit and assist you in applying. WEBSITE: www.gurfinkel.com Follow us on Facebook.com/GurfinkelL­aw and Twitter @GurfinkelL­aw Four offices to serve you: PHILIPPINE­S: 894-0258 or 894-0239; LOS ANGELES; SAN FRANCISCO; NEW YORK: TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-GURFINKEL (1-866-487-3465)

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines